reply to dr mind benders comment
Your problem is not with my first statement, which was not written as a text-book example of logic but a creative and poetic way in which to get my method acrross, but with your beleif that i was making an attack against Tamara.
So you based your argument on a beleif that i was 'attacking' Tamara, a beleif that you have gleaned from my writings. I alone know what i was thinking when i wrote that statement, and it definatley had nothing to do with hurting Tamara in any way.
Therefore the foundation of your argument has now dissapeared.
So your wrath and ridicule can now subside :)
If it doesnt, then it wont affect me in the slightest.
So you based your argument on a beleif that i was 'attacking' Tamara, a beleif that you have gleaned from my writings. I alone know what i was thinking when i wrote that statement, and it definatley had nothing to do with hurting Tamara in any way.
Therefore the foundation of your argument has now dissapeared.
So your wrath and ridicule can now subside :)
If it doesnt, then it wont affect me in the slightest.