would someone please explain to me why getting rid of net neutrality would be anything but wrong?
it seems to me that the only reason getting rid of net neutrality would be good is so that it would benefit whatever select special interests financially.... why in the hell is that desirable at all??
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/matt-stoller/hillary-clintons-lobbyis_b_80990.html here is someone who is for the destruction of net neutrality... I have trouble seeing any real points to his argument.... for me his argument becomes too attenuated and evaporates..
http://www.precursorblog.com/node/552 fuck the middle men, and those federales pigs. look what they did to the hippies... they turned a bunch of lovey dovey cultural sub-group stoners into hustlers, and dishonest criminals.. and increased crime... the fewer jackass suits between me and what I want the better... I just want a healthy community/society is all....in its full diversity and spectrum.... once we cut those fuckers' jobs out of the picture and stop paying some dickwad twice his annual pay for illegally confiscating a few grand worth of contraband here and there, the better.. as far as I 'm concerned the narc biz is gritty biz...those narcs are on the same team as the violent drug offenders IMO. If they made crack legal would you smoke it? Look at amsterdam...the dutch think drugs are dumn.. what a racket...
backwards money grubbing fookers..