Oddly, I think I classified Asterix as "other, opposite" but the Count as "representation of self." I think it's because I recognize Asterix (and know he is not you) but the Count is just a Count, who I associate with you.
Which points up the extremely arbitrary nature of this analysis, I guess. What means "me" to one person might not mean "me" to someone else (as see damned_colonial's comment to my post on DW).
Which points up the extremely arbitrary nature of this analysis, I guess. What means "me" to one person might not mean "me" to someone else (as see
damned_colonial's comment to my post on DW).
Reply
Leave a comment