Very Well-Rounded
You have:
70% SCIENTIFIC INTUITION and
62% EMOTIONAL INTUITION
The graph on the right represents your place in Intuition 2-Space. As you can see, you scored above average on emotional intuition and above average on scientific intuition. (Weirdly, your emotional and scientific intuitions are equally strong.)
Your Emotional Intuition score is a measure of how well you understand people, especially their unspoken needs and sympathies. A high score score usually indicates social grace and persuasiveness. A low score usually means you're good at Quake.
Your Scientific Intuition score tells you how in tune you are with the world around you; how well you understand your physical and intellectual environment. People with high scores here are apt to succeed in business and, of course, the sciences.
Try my other test!
The 3 Variable Funny TestIt rules.
My test tracked 2 variables How you compared to other people your age and gender:
You scored higher than 57% on Scientific
You scored higher than 36% on Interpersonal
Link:
The 2-Variable Intuition Test written by
jason_bateman on
OkCupid Free Online Dating, home of the
32-Type Dating Test What else? Er, well, the government failed to get a Bill through Commons. That was quite funny. On the other hand, it's a pity we'll all get murdered by terrorists now. On the other other hand, literally each and every cop in the UK supported ninety-day detention (Charlie Falconer said so! I've got it on tape!), so it can't have been all that great an idea.
Still, as the Boss said, paraphrasing Winston Churchill and Andi Peters: "No retreat, baby, no surrender". That was Hanoi John Kerry's campaign song. Until he conceded.
Speaking of funky pop music, watching Ghostbusters for the septillionth time the other night inspired me to check out the song Ray Parker Jr was meant to have ripped off, "I Want a New Drug" by Huey Lewis and the News. I think it's safe to say there's something in the allegations. Just listen to the bassline in the verse! It's the same tune! The Ghostbusters song's much better though. If you copy something, but improve on it a lot, is that plagiarism or evolution? Science works this way, so why shouldn't art? As long as you acknowledge the original, what's the harm? Intellectual property, schmintellectual property, say I!
Or maybe not. I'm not really sure.
There just aren't enough hours in the day!
Wait, not Andi Peters. The UDA.