Happiness. It's been a topic of discussion on the blog of fellow INTJ ehowton many times. ehowton is a happy man. New INTJ acquaintance,
( Read more... )
Introspective is how I would've classified myself up through my mid-20s. Until I learned that happiness was a choice. It was that easy - like a lightswitch. Once I figured out I could be happy if I chose to be, I was.
Is it an INTJ thing?
I think that depends upon interpretation. If you hinge happiness on conventionality and acceptance, absolutely, for shedding myself of these things as INTJ are wont to do means I am no longer negatively affected by them.
Secondly, who outside of INTx can so effortlessly wholly assimilate and put into practical application new information. Information as far-reaching and complex as, "Happiness is a choice?"
I would not relate my introspection to happiness or the lack thereof. If anything, I would suggest that the introspection was a factor contributing to happiness, since I was satisfied with exploring things for myself.
What I did figure out around my early twenties is how I could attract people if I wanted to. Normally I project an aura of going about my own business and I enjoy not being approached in general.
As for convention and such... I never did manage to fit in in that regard; then we are probably talking about age 6 or so, or earlier still.
I am not sure I agree with the notion "happiness is a choice", but I do believe that you can influence your experiences strongly, so insofar happiness is based on those, you have some amount of control.
Exactly on introspection and its regard to approachability!
As far as happiness as a choice, while there may be far more at work than the description belies, it works as an easily understandable definition of what's at work. While I agree wholeheartedly about influencing experiences, I've often tested myself by choosing experiences I thought I may hate on purpose - then changed my own viewpoint of them to see if I could attain happiness under those circumstances.
I can rely on me a whole lot more effectively than I can rely on attempting to control external things. So by definition, I'm choosing to be happy in any situation I'm in, because I can control my own perception. At least that's my working theory. I'm very good at it, but my denotation could probably use some work :/
I do not go out of my way to try things I think I will hate. However, when the need arises or when the context is right for another reason, I do do things I do not specifically expect to enjoy, and I try to find a constructive viewpoint when so doing
( ... )
As I am just now studying Buddhist philosophy, I am unfamiliar with the differences between the two schools of thought, though I suspect I would side with you given your example.
I do not do the things I do for control, rather to test. I am a scenario-runner, and I often place myself in situations for empirical data and nothing more.
Is it an INTJ thing?
I think that depends upon interpretation. If you hinge happiness on conventionality and acceptance, absolutely, for shedding myself of these things as INTJ are wont to do means I am no longer negatively affected by them.
Secondly, who outside of INTx can so effortlessly wholly assimilate and put into practical application new information. Information as far-reaching and complex as, "Happiness is a choice?"
Reply
Reply
What I did figure out around my early twenties is how I could attract people if I wanted to. Normally I project an aura of going about my own business and I enjoy not being approached in general.
As for convention and such... I never did manage to fit in in that regard; then we are probably talking about age 6 or so, or earlier still.
I am not sure I agree with the notion "happiness is a choice", but I do believe that you can influence your experiences strongly, so insofar happiness is based on those, you have some amount of control.
Reply
As far as happiness as a choice, while there may be far more at work than the description belies, it works as an easily understandable definition of what's at work. While I agree wholeheartedly about influencing experiences, I've often tested myself by choosing experiences I thought I may hate on purpose - then changed my own viewpoint of them to see if I could attain happiness under those circumstances.
I can rely on me a whole lot more effectively than I can rely on attempting to control external things. So by definition, I'm choosing to be happy in any situation I'm in, because I can control my own perception. At least that's my working theory. I'm very good at it, but my denotation could probably use some work :/
Reply
Reply
I do not do the things I do for control, rather to test. I am a scenario-runner, and I often place myself in situations for empirical data and nothing more.
Reply
Leave a comment