As goes Freevote, so goes LiveJournal...

Jun 20, 2006 16:03

One of the lesser-known tales in the whole mythological, selectively PR'ed history of LiveJournal/SixApart is the story of Freevote.com.

(Don't bother looking for Freevote online... it doesn't exist anymore.)

Freevote.com was, as Brad Fitzpatrick describes it, "my first web project back in like 1998 . . . where I learned so much about Perl, ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 130

keshaphim June 21 2006, 00:25:33 UTC
HA!rodneyorpheus predicted this when LJ was sold to SixApart.

Reply

insomnia June 21 2006, 00:34:54 UTC
So did I, actually. There were already moves towards it before the sale to 6A.

Reply

keshaphim June 21 2006, 00:35:38 UTC
I believe you. I just didn't have the pleasure of your LJ acquaintance back then. :D

Reply

shawnwellborne October 9 2008, 16:59:46 UTC
Rodneyorpheus predicted this when LJ was sold to SixApart. . . . Is SixApart still making the LJ source available.

Reply


sebab June 21 2006, 00:35:27 UTC
Is SixApart still making the LJ source available? Just wondering, not that I personally could do much about it.

Reply

insomnia June 21 2006, 01:12:58 UTC
The old source is still available, but more and more of the new code isn't being open sourced. As a result, it is harder (and sometimes impossible) for LiveJournal code-based sites to add new features, styles, etc.

Links to the code and to the 3rd party client tools have been buried recently, though you can find the links if you dig deeply enough into the site. (Good luck, new users!)

Reply

(The comment has been removed)

sebab June 21 2006, 08:41:14 UTC
Arguably, phone posts, the control strip, new styles, the new posting interface, and other design and interface changes are the bulk of the major changes that have been released recently. Pretty much all of this is unavailable in the code base, from what I've seen. Also unavailable are much of the results of the translation project, which means that LJ Code is far less usable overseas than it really should be... and overseas sites are perhaps the biggest potential audience for LJ Code.

As for styles, it definitely interferes with new lj-code sites when many of the latest styles are proprietary to SixApart.

Reply


(The comment has been removed)

keshaphim June 21 2006, 00:52:23 UTC
That needs to be a quote. GOOD ONE.

Reply

(The comment has been removed)

keshaphim June 21 2006, 00:55:40 UTC
*snort*
*puts on some Snog - Corporate Slave*

Reply


pope_guilty June 21 2006, 00:50:21 UTC
That wasn't the eFront network, run by Sam Jain, was it? Lowtax over at SomethingAwful went through something almost identical to that back in the day.

Reply

insomnia June 21 2006, 01:15:39 UTC
It's been so long, that I don't even remember who it was. That said, there were several companies that did this, and went belly-up, taking entire sites/services/communities with them.

Reply

ratkrycek June 21 2006, 10:19:00 UTC
I remember those days.

Seems one of the few that has lasted is Yahoo, and they did some of the same things.

Reply


Wow mike_pett June 21 2006, 00:59:51 UTC
Dude I was just thinking that this was a slippery slope and that I had better create some real world equivalent of these relationships quick or I could totally count on losing you all soon.

Sad this.

M

Reply


Leave a comment

Up