This needed to be more widely seen. Letter to the editor
in the Hartford Courant, via
Suspect Device. I take issue with the statement that "Katrina was proof that the levee system is unable to withstand the strongest hurricanes" [editorial, Jan. 11, "New Orleans Needs Leadership
(
Read more... )
Comments 5
Reply
For the record, New Orleans was not built below sea level. The older parts of town were and are well above such; the areas below are some of the modern suburbs built on drained back swamp that has subsided, and includes no inhabited area lower than a couple feet below. And mean sea level really isn't the problem. The problem was a massive hurricane producing a huge tidal surge that put some areas up to 30 feet above sea level under water. Combined of course with the problem that the project for the USACOE to provide the city with protection from the greatest level of storm anticipated for the region which Congress mandated back in the '60s was badly bungled.
Reply
BTW I incorporated that letter in todays post at "Our Man In New Orleans" as well.
http://vancouverjazz.com/jdoheny/
you might find the site that hosts that interesting as well.
http://www.vancouverjazz.com
If you scroll down a bit on the portal page, there's an interesting 25 minute TV documentary from 1967 on my late teacher and mentor, saxophonist Fraser Macpherson.
Reply
Reply
Though, since there was also considerable advance expectation that Katrina might produce a storm surge so large that even correctly functioning floodwalls would not help, this fact does not give federal, state and local officials an out.
(The only reason this is worth saying again being that Bush actually tried to use this as an excuse.)
Reply
Leave a comment