Photos or Photoshop?
This is the real problem - but the problem of "eternal'" kind with no final decision.
I speak about the "postprocessing" of the photos and their initial realism.
I guess - when we use various options Before taking the shot - this is ok, cause we need to find an appropriate solution for the given circumstances.
However, when numerous photographers begin to adjust their photos with some Photoshop, Gimp and other graphic editiors...
Yes, the result of such a processing may look much more beautiful. However... it's not the initial photo appearance and here is no connection with a reality... just a marketing....
I guess I am wrong... yet anyway when some visitors ask me why my photos look so ordinary with no photoshop effects - I always answer that I show them the world right in the same way as I saw it.
The world is quite ordinary "thing", right? :)
I speak about the "postprocessing" of the photos and their initial realism.
I guess - when we use various options Before taking the shot - this is ok, cause we need to find an appropriate solution for the given circumstances.
However, when numerous photographers begin to adjust their photos with some Photoshop, Gimp and other graphic editiors...
Yes, the result of such a processing may look much more beautiful. However... it's not the initial photo appearance and here is no connection with a reality... just a marketing....
I guess I am wrong... yet anyway when some visitors ask me why my photos look so ordinary with no photoshop effects - I always answer that I show them the world right in the same way as I saw it.
The world is quite ordinary "thing", right? :)