World War III to IVinfernal_magnetAugust 26 2006, 21:51:08 UTC
The much maligned second amendment {"the right to bear arms"} actually had a very important purpose - to enable the American people to form armed militias for the purpose of protecting themselves from the government. Now it is merely an excuse for arms companies to make huge profits and to continue the infighting and murders amongst the populace. Yes, which makes me wonder how it will all go down in America.. Having a large section of the domestic population armed means that invasion by subterfuge is far preferable to invasion by force
( ... )
Re: World War III to IVnovenAugust 27 2006, 07:08:12 UTC
"In fact, if we make the judgment that our rights are being systematically violated, we have not merely the right, but the duty, to resist and overthrow the power responsible." - Alan Keyes
HAH!
The US is certainly the country that should shoulder the largest blame for global warming. And look at how they treat their citizens when disaster does strike. Hezzbolah knows how to deal with disaster - look at their efforts in the aftermath of the Israeli bombing. Maybe the US should have called them in to deal with New Orleans.
While Americas unpopularity soars in the middle east, just watch the shifts to accepting euros for oil. There may be a period of wringing all the political concessions they can out of the US before fully enacting it, but it will happen.
I hadn't thought about that nuclear subterfuge. Now I do it seems very reasonable and plausible. Scary fucking thought. But no matter how they spin it the world won't fall for it. Scary fucking times.
Re: World War III to IVinfernal_magnetAugust 27 2006, 09:44:18 UTC
Yes, well, excactly, which is the difference between FEMA and Hizbullah. Hizbullah is actually concerned about the poor, which IMHO underpins the western definition of terrorist.. Ugh, my enter key is busted, so my formatting is fuckled. As far as the IOB goes, the USA would sooner go to war than allow the acceptance of oil for euros. They have nothing to lose, except thier entire economy, which has been running on a war footing since world war two.. check out http://onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/article_1029.shtml . damn my lack of an enter key.. $)
Comments 4
Reply
Yes, which makes me wonder how it will all go down in America.. Having a large section of the domestic population armed means that invasion by subterfuge is far preferable to invasion by force ( ... )
Reply
HAH!
The US is certainly the country that should shoulder the largest blame for global warming. And look at how they treat their citizens when disaster does strike. Hezzbolah knows how to deal with disaster - look at their efforts in the aftermath of the Israeli bombing. Maybe the US should have called them in to deal with New Orleans.
While Americas unpopularity soars in the middle east, just watch the shifts to accepting euros for oil. There may be a period of wringing all the political concessions they can out of the US before fully enacting it, but it will happen.
I hadn't thought about that nuclear subterfuge. Now I do it seems very reasonable and plausible. Scary fucking thought. But no matter how they spin it the world won't fall for it. Scary fucking times.
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment