I've been following the Social Security 'no match' story for weeks and knew what was coming, but the other morning I opened the front page of the Chicago Tribune and read a clip from the notoriously liberal Los Angeles Times that filled me with rage: (Click twice for full view)
(
Read more... )
I'm not sure that either party is for immigration reform. They are both interested in the bottom line: Republicans are in the pocket of big business; dems are interested in the hispanic voting bloc and can use them as a way to push socialized medicine. That's my humble opinion stated in few words.
One thing that irritates me that people (and newspapers) bring up is how we supposedly need illegals because of the rising cost of food. That's nonsense! Food prices are going up because of the gas prices, and if we didn't have the illegals around bringing down our wages, we'd be better able to foot the bill.
That's another one of my opinions, but at least I didn't publish it in a newspaper as a supposed fact! I don't appreciate how the above article tells us that 'Congress needs to pass some sort of legalization program' as if it were a fact.
Also, the liberal newspapers are all saying that the people are for anmesty. Hell with that! They should actually talk to some of 'the people'. I'm one of them!
Reply
Thank you for your answer. Saddly we would still have to address the issue as a WHO IS FOR IMMIGRATION REFORM and WHO IS AGAINST IMMIGRATION REFORM.
As Kharmii said, "I'm not sure that either pary is for immigration reform." And I concurr this point, some Rep. are for the Immigration Reform and some are not. Same can be said for the Dem. But I feel in order to get a full grasp on this issue the people need to push to make the partys draw a line as to who is for the immigration reform and who is against.
In the end I think one of these partys are going to have to pick their stand on this issue. I'm sure it'll just take time...
Cheers,
Sean
Reply
On a side note: Have you noticed how other countries are having similiar problems to the US? I just read in Reuters a few days back how Switzerland voted in a rightwing leader because he lobbied for the removal of bogus refugees, illegals abusing welfare, illegals committing crimes, etc.
Reply
I just went to CNN and looked at what possition all the candidates stand on. And it seems like the majority of our candidates are for Immigration Reform. However, the same can be said about Gay Merrage. lol
Cheers,
Sean.
Reply
Reply
Cheers,
Sean.
Reply
Reply
Not really, I was being facishious(SP). LOL!
Reply
Reply
Secondly, those Mexican assibilage that took place earlyer this year.... Question: Why the hell didn't anyone screen people for Idetification and see who the real immigrants are. In my English Comp Class their is a Mexican American and she was trying to say to me that it's difficult to get a green card and passport and stuff.
Seriously I looked at her and said, Have you tried? And if you have then how long does it take? And secondly if Mexicans are so bent on getting over here why cant they just bone up go through the papers and do what they should do. Instead of comming to America and then being caught and then going back to were they started. It doesn't make sense to me. And I don't understand why people can't just fill out papers and go through the process. To me it just seems like a lot of lazyness.
Cheers,
Sean.
Reply
Border Fence Work to Resume
Another case of a federal judge working against the will of the people for some bs reason. These federal judges have too much power and the majority of them are liberal. Another thing that both scares and infuriates me is how illegals have organizations working within our country to sue the cities cracking down on them! How is that even able to happen?
Reply
Reply
Reply
Anyway, I don't think the source is based on actual Logos. And it could of been one of those things to start some kind of rumor mill. ya'know?
In any case I thought it was intreging.
Reply
Leave a comment