Событие одновременно катастрофическое и каталитическое по Дж. Бушу-старшему.
catastrophic catalizing event bush 2000
Событие одновременно катастрофическое и каталитическое по Дж. Бушу-старшему - какое бы вы думали?
В 2000 году он назвал... Пёрл-Харбор!
Угроблено 2000 своих военных и цвет морского флота США - но какой КАТАЛИЗ!
(про 2001, значит, только намекнул ("like a new Pearl-Harbour");
а про 2020 - сами кумекайте)
TОЧНАЯ ЦИТАТА:
"The concept of catalysis can be used also outside chemistry, for instance in politics. Let’s go back to the year 2000, when the group of American neoconservatives identifying themselves as the “Project for a New American Century” (PNAC) issued a document titled “Rebuilding American Defenses.” In that document, they argued that the American public could be led to accept a major shift of the available resources to military purposes only by means of “some catastrophic and catalyzing event - like a new Pearl Harbor.”Surely, the PNAC members were highly successful with their plans, perhaps more than they themselves would have imagined. One year later, in 2001, the world saw the 9/11 attacks on the World Trade Center in New York and on other locations, providing exactly the “catastrophic and catalyzing event” they had invoked. It was Pearl Harbor again: a new attack on the American soil that catalyzed a strong reaction on the part of the American people. The result was that several of the PNAC proposals, such as a significant increase in military expenses, were adopted in the following years.".
UPD:
https://web.archive.org/web/20110928001311/http://2012info.ca/articles/
Событие одновременно катастрофическое и каталитическое по Дж. Бушу-старшему - какое бы вы думали?
В 2000 году он назвал... Пёрл-Харбор!
Угроблено 2000 своих военных и цвет морского флота США - но какой КАТАЛИЗ!
(про 2001, значит, только намекнул ("like a new Pearl-Harbour");
а про 2020 - сами кумекайте)
TОЧНАЯ ЦИТАТА:
"The concept of catalysis can be used also outside chemistry, for instance in politics. Let’s go back to the year 2000, when the group of American neoconservatives identifying themselves as the “Project for a New American Century” (PNAC) issued a document titled “Rebuilding American Defenses.” In that document, they argued that the American public could be led to accept a major shift of the available resources to military purposes only by means of “some catastrophic and catalyzing event - like a new Pearl Harbor.”Surely, the PNAC members were highly successful with their plans, perhaps more than they themselves would have imagined. One year later, in 2001, the world saw the 9/11 attacks on the World Trade Center in New York and on other locations, providing exactly the “catastrophic and catalyzing event” they had invoked. It was Pearl Harbor again: a new attack on the American soil that catalyzed a strong reaction on the part of the American people. The result was that several of the PNAC proposals, such as a significant increase in military expenses, were adopted in the following years.".
UPD:
https://web.archive.org/web/20110928001311/http://2012info.ca/articles/