(Untitled)

Aug 05, 2010 14:43

Secret Post 411

Why's that fuckin' priest walking around and laughing every time he goddamn comes near me? Fucking weirdo.

Anyway, your lame secrets )

secret post

Leave a comment

6., 7. live_ringer August 5 2010, 19:02:45 UTC
6. You sound a little smug. Maybe it's a good thing whoever it is beat you.

7. [See this? This is one eyebrow arching as far as it will go.]

There's quite a few things I could say, here, but I suppose I'll start off with the fact that I'm surprised you didn't include yourself, Bell oh secret-maker.

Reply

live_ringer August 6 2010, 00:00:22 UTC
7. How do you know I didn't?

Reply

live_ringer August 6 2010, 00:10:05 UTC
7. Call it a hunch.

Reply

live_ringer August 6 2010, 02:07:47 UTC
7. I see.
Maybe I just ran out of room.

Reply

live_ringer August 6 2010, 02:21:04 UTC
7. Naw, I see at least two, maybe three places where another picture would have fit.

Wanna try for another excuse?

Reply

live_ringer August 6 2010, 02:30:56 UTC
7. Oh? Well, maybe next time.

I didn't have a good picture of myself anyway.

Reply

live_ringer August 6 2010, 02:44:11 UTC
7. I'd be all for foregoing that 'next time'. Don't want to get redundant, after all.

[Even if the reactions of most mentioned are priceless.]

Reply

live_ringer August 6 2010, 02:47:13 UTC
7. I happen to like routine. But, if you prefer, I'll think up something new for next time.

Maybe about a different "harem."

Reply

live_ringer August 6 2010, 03:48:09 UTC
7. I'm sure whatever you think up next will turn plenty of heads.

[And a few tempers, if the responses here are anything to go by.]

Also, if this counts as a harem, I'd say it's a bit off. To many members, wrong central person.

Reply

live_ringer August 6 2010, 03:59:52 UTC
7. I hope it lives up to expectations.

[Yeah...uh, someone needs to watch his step right now. This secret was made days ago. The fact that it follows so closely on the heels of yet another ingame argument is just ironic.]

Oh? Who should be central? And what is the person-limit for harems?

Reply

live_ringer August 6 2010, 04:13:39 UTC
7. Not-Genius? Guy can have a "harem", I don't care, but I'm sure as hell not about to claim to be a part of it.

[And the person limit includes 'not-Lezard', as far as Gene's concerned.]

Reply

wtf recaptcha? "I'm spoofing"?? live_ringer August 6 2010, 04:18:10 UTC
7. How about we make Youth central, take out Lezard and the taco-girl, and maybe Qi, and add Bastet and Stoneface?

[But picking someone's boss is always the funny thing to do! At least Boss wasn't included?]

Reply

captcha thinks it's all one big joke, clearly live_ringer August 6 2010, 04:23:28 UTC
7. Interesting as that arrangement is, I think I'll personally decline participation. But have fun with it?

[True. Very true.]

Reply

clearly live_ringer August 6 2010, 04:37:43 UTC
7. We will.
Though, I'm sure they were so looking forward to having you.

Reply

live_ringer August 6 2010, 04:44:45 UTC
7. I'm sure they'll be able to get past the disappointment.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up