Given the astonishing constraints of time and budget that a little vignette like this must face, I have to give Steven Moffat kudos for pulling off as much characterisation and even perfunctory plot as he did.
(
Spoilers for the Doctor Who Children In Need Special 2007 )
I pity you as you obviously have no joy in your soul :p
Reply
Reply
Well - there's a fair bit of dross across the whole run. I think its inevitable when a show runs for 26 years pretty much non-stop... I think the important thing is that when the show is good it is amongst the best TV out there...
Reply
On the other hand there's very little Doctor Who that isn't dated, slow-paced, occasionally awkward, and severely hamstrung by production constraints. On that level I'd feel the need to offer a few pre-emptive excuses to anyone I was holding it up to!
You take the rough with the smooth, but on its best days it was smooth enough not to chafe *too* badly. Not enough to distract from the good bits, anyway. :-)
Reply
I think that holds for most TV - not just Who. The problem genre TV has is the dependence on effects - which will always date stuff (take TNG for example - it looks terribly dated now - slick admittedly, but it screams late-80s/early-90s in the same way that a lot of Who and Blake's 7 scream 70s).
Reply
Leave a comment