fall
we were walking, talking about capital. I guess the underlying question was can everything be placed on one scale and then measured? still there were other issues even given that first principle. on a practical level were these other issues. but like most of our conversations it just ended with awe and confusion.
we were frequently in love with ourselves, and much less frequently in love with each other, and not in sync with apparently random periods, oscillations that would never align, and so then were most certainly not random? we'd wonder about the connection, why we couldn't be loving each other at the same time.
but I would always let you touch me. but I would always give myself over, not that it'd be any good. I had embraced weakness and I had tried to let my self go. if that even makes any sense. if that is something you can do. does it have an underlying purpose I would wonder. is everything to bring me next to you?
we were frequently in love with ourselves, and much less frequently in love with each other, and not in sync with apparently random periods, oscillations that would never align, and so then were most certainly not random? we'd wonder about the connection, why we couldn't be loving each other at the same time.
but I would always let you touch me. but I would always give myself over, not that it'd be any good. I had embraced weakness and I had tried to let my self go. if that even makes any sense. if that is something you can do. does it have an underlying purpose I would wonder. is everything to bring me next to you?