A writing-related question for anyone on my FL who has an interest in it, even if only from a reader's perspective: at what point does it become acceptable for a story to sacrifice or ignore internal logic in the name of style? Is it ever okay for a story to contain a few plot holes/illogical moments in the name of making the story more interesting
(
Read more... )
Thinking about it now I suspect the basic story type is Event, with a little extra chunk of Character thrown in for good measure and then all the psychological stuff I mentioned that defies categorisation. Like you say, I think it'll be a little harder to fudge details here but on the other hand I seem to be making some progress resolving my little plot conflicts so there's hope yet. :)
Oh, and about disaster movies... who needs logic and consistency when you can have 'SPLOSIONS? ;) I'm pretty sure there's some kind of Hollywood formula for importance of resolving plot holes against dollars spent on CGI...
Also, thanks for the Google Books link! I'll have to bear that in mind for when I'm settled down somewhere and have money. :) Books in Australia all seem to be stupid expensive for some reason, more than double what you'd pay in the UK.
Reply
I was thinking about this other writing book I have, "A Story is a Promise". I forget the author but I'm sure you could google it. Basically he says that when you write a story, you start off by posing a question. What that question is tied a lot into the MICE quotient. If the first chapter of a book has people wondering, "What caused the crew to lose their memories and will they be able to find out the truth?" then the readers will be more prone to wanting the technical details -- assuming the details are technical and not supernatural.
Reply
Leave a comment