R.
You have to ask yourself, see, at four o’clock in the morning, which is more important - to be laying out in great verbal tracts all the abstract and intellectual reasons WHY, to attempt to quanitify and lock down in communicable form what it is we do and why we do it, or to simply do and be and feel and live and not give a fuck about separating yourself from what it is you feel, to not try to explain any of it, to trust that it is beyond the ken of analytical modes of thought and simply groove with it and trust that history will absolve you. The point is - are you still there? - that it’s all about being on the side of truth. Assuming there is one overriding ‘right’, who can claim it, the feelers or the explainers? And here’s the big question - is it possible to be both?