Of Pensieves and Memory and Age (oh my!)

Feb 08, 2006 02:32

I had a discussion in my own journal a day or so ago, asking specifically "Why didn't Harry ever think to use a Pensieve to go over his memories of Godric's Hollow? We know that he has SOME memory of them somewhere, because he was able to hear a running commentary of it when the Dementors were around ( Read more... )

wizarding world:magic:pensieves, characters:potter family:harry

Leave a comment

midnitemaraud_r February 8 2006, 17:44:03 UTC
Actually, I'm rather under the impression that the reason Harry has never used a pensieve himself is because such an act wouldn't fit in with the plot. She gives us bits and bobs of information in a particular order. For instance, non-verbal spells. There were a few examples in previous books, but they were pretty much mostly done by Dumbledore - and even wandless as well in some instances. But in general, Harry (and therefore we the reader) never really noticed non-verbal spells as being a common thing for older students and adults. Then again, Harry is obviously not very aware of a lot of things - like McLaggen being in Gryffindor. That bothered me mostly because McLaggen is not the type who would blend in into the shadows - he was brash and loud and annoying and I found it hard to believe that for five whole years Harry never really noticed him in either the common room or at the table in the Great Hall ( ... )

Reply

m_ho February 8 2006, 21:49:51 UTC
It's all about the plot and her slow, gradual revelation of clues that serve both the main plot on the whole and the particular plot of each book. She likes her secrets and the 'big reveal'. We can't know, therefore Harry can't know, until she wants us to.

This is the line I tow, so far be it from me to actually try to explain some of Rowling's plot holes organically, but here I go: Harry's never looked at his own memories because he's not introspective at all (belying his curiosity), and he's never really had access to a Pensieve. I guess he could ask Dumbledore to borrow his, but Dumbledore would deny him for the same reasons he won't tell Harry why he trusts Snape or deny him with the "it doesn't do to dwell on dreams" line (not exact quote as I am bookless). I guess Harry could buy one, but he's never made an expensive purchase before, and I don't see him starting with a Pensieve.

Reply

cmwinters February 9 2006, 06:47:37 UTC
I don't know that Dumbledore would discourage him on the basis of "not being good to dwell on dreams" at all, actually.

Dumbledore's told him that Pensieves help when you have too much going on in your mind and it helps you to straighten your thoughts and view things from a different perspective, but yes, I agree (obviously) that giving one to Harry if it could potentially be harmful to Snape, he wouldn't encourage it. ;P

Reply

m_ho February 10 2006, 18:49:56 UTC
Dumbledore's told him that Pensieves help when you have too much going on in your mind and it helps you to straighten your thoughts and view things from a different perspective...

Good point. The Mirror of Erised serves a completely different and opposite purpose, as it is purely dream. I was just thinking that by only revisiting familial moments in the Pensieve, Harry would be focusing on this unattainable dream, even if he were trying to clarify events. But the mirror would probably show things all idealized, whereas the Pensieve would show things as they are, so not very dream-like at all.

Reply

cmwinters February 9 2006, 06:50:05 UTC
Speaking of the CoS...in PoA, one of the secret passages out of the school "caved in last year" and I want to know if it's somehow related to the Chamber.

I could explain Harry's not going to GH before as him not having the freedom to do so. He's either been at school, or at the Dursley's, and THEY don't allow him to go to the damned *bathroom* without permission, much less gallivanting off on an adventure.

But yes, I do think he should've been asking more questions.

I'd say that the reason that the Ministry doesn't accept Pensieve memories as proof is A) they can be doctored and B) specifically with regards to Harry and his claims at the end of GoF...they simply didn't want to believe him. So why give him any chance to prove it, specifically by a method known to be tampered with? And I'm quite sure Dumbledore could doctor up a memory quite well.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up