Headachy now.

Sep 27, 2007 08:30

Regarding the latest Who-wank: one of the things that truly annoys me about this kind of thing (if you really want to know, go to fandom_wank for the details) is the protestations on both sides that the wankery all belongs to one side, and certainly not theirs. "Rose is the Doctor's One Twu Wuv 4EVA, and if you 'ship the Doctor with anyone else, ( Read more... )

pretentious pedantry, doctor who, pedantic ponderings

Leave a comment

izhilzha September 27 2007, 17:44:05 UTC
Word to pretty much all of that. As a genficcer, to whom (despite my newbie status) this show is All About The Doctor, this particular divide alone has been mainly responsible for me avoiding the generalized Who fandom. Were I to participate in wankery, it would be something like "no matter how much in love with the Doctor Rose or Martha were, he doesn't/didn't return their love in exactly the same fashion," because I can't imagine a companion, any companion, in a true exclusive relationship with the Doctor. Rose may have come closest, but I just can't 'ship the Doctor. *shrug* I realize this is an unpopular theory! :-)

Anyway.

now I've got a Xander/Martha plot poodle yapping at me!

Huh. I have no idea why that seems to plausible to me. You should write that! I would totally read it.

Reply

izhilzha September 27 2007, 17:45:18 UTC
so plausible. Grrrr. Typing too fast.

Reply

honorh September 27 2007, 18:03:07 UTC
To me, one of the keystones of the Doctor is that he's a wanderer in every way. Even his heart never settles for long. While he and Rose might have been happy for a time, in the context of his life, even that would've been momentary. So I'm more on your side than not.

Reply

izhilzha September 27 2007, 18:29:09 UTC
What a LOVELY way to put it. Yes, the eternal wanderer. *glee*

Reply

ladypeyton September 27 2007, 18:09:09 UTC
You're not alone.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up