>well, it seems like you're driven by one specific (and very pressing) set of issues.
Well, it's a set of issues that's tied up with nearly everything else, though. Can't really do much about it without basically taking the whole complex web of interrelations of our current culture into account. (Full disclosure: I really would like to see us build a *very* different *world*... which probably means I should join some revolutionary organisation, lol)
>A political party will most likely be set up with the aim that it would one day be part of the government.
One of the two I'm considering is actually part of the German government. The other used to be. They're both deeply in crisis, though, so it's anybody's guess how long it'll last/if they'll ever be governing again.
>This has its ramifications for you as, by signing up to a party, you'll be signing up for a whole suite of policies across the spectrum of governance, when you might not really agree with all of them.
Well, you don't have to agree with everything that's in a party program. There are always people who disagree about some aspects. And party programs can be changed, they're subject to relatively frequent revision, in fact. That is why joining a party seems like a good idea to me - not because any of them is currently doing what I'd like them to do, but because I figure if people like me get active in them, they *might*, eventually, start doing what I'd like them to do. The idea is to help build a groundswell within the organisation. Carry some of the urgency I feel into a group of people who might productively get 'infected' by the same sense of urgency.
>It also means that most parties only operate on a national level.
Well, that's still a crucial level for actual policy decisions. And influence runs both ways - sure, decisions taken on a higher level will influence national policy. But national policy, if successful, may also end up influencing decisions on higher levels/other national governments.
>Of course, single issue and local parties do exist, and they do good work towards raising awareness, but in terms of effecting policy change in central government, I don't think they're as effective as NGOs.
Well, I was thinking about a national, multi-issue party anyway. :-)
>Now with NGOs, it depends what you want for yourself. I personally felt that a mixture of direct lobbying of world leaders and nationwide or international awareness-raising campaigns was likely to have the most success, and so I plumped for making regular, if modest, financial contributions to an international environment-oriented NGO. Most NGOs will offer you a chance to be more directly involved in raising awareness, petitioning government officials or fundraising. If you really feel a need to be part of the group steering the NGO,
No, not really. I don't think I'm much of a leader - and that kind of thing tends to eat your life. I'd just like to do my little bit, somewhere. (E.g. I'm currently doing some proofreading for 350.org. Couple of hours per week, and it makes their German website more 'readable', makes it communicate more clearly - seems like a fairly good investment of my time. :-))
>however, it would be easier to opt for a smaller, perhaps local group. The trade-off is that their reach wouldn't be quite as broad - although they may be remarkably successful in their community.
Yeah, see, I can't think of a local group around here. Except for a very NIMBY-type anti-airport group. I approve of their efforts, but their focus (which is on avoiding the expansion of the Frankfurt airport, for a variety of reasons - local environment and health concerns, noise, property values etc.) is really far too narrow.
>Above all of that, you should research the platforms of various likely parties and NGOs, and decide which one you really feel you can commit yourself to.
Yeah, already done that, actually. Just still undecided. One thing I find difficult is to decide where one may potentially do more good.
Well, it's a set of issues that's tied up with nearly everything else, though. Can't really do much about it without basically taking the whole complex web of interrelations of our current culture into account. (Full disclosure: I really would like to see us build a *very* different *world*... which probably means I should join some revolutionary organisation, lol)
>A political party will most likely be set up with the aim that it would one day be part of the government.
One of the two I'm considering is actually part of the German government. The other used to be. They're both deeply in crisis, though, so it's anybody's guess how long it'll last/if they'll ever be governing again.
>This has its ramifications for you as, by signing up to a party, you'll be signing up for a whole suite of policies across the spectrum of governance, when you might not really agree with all of them.
Well, you don't have to agree with everything that's in a party program. There are always people who disagree about some aspects. And party programs can be changed, they're subject to relatively frequent revision, in fact. That is why joining a party seems like a good idea to me - not because any of them is currently doing what I'd like them to do, but because I figure if people like me get active in them, they *might*, eventually, start doing what I'd like them to do. The idea is to help build a groundswell within the organisation. Carry some of the urgency I feel into a group of people who might productively get 'infected' by the same sense of urgency.
>It also means that most parties only operate on a national level.
Well, that's still a crucial level for actual policy decisions. And influence runs both ways - sure, decisions taken on a higher level will influence national policy. But national policy, if successful, may also end up influencing decisions on higher levels/other national governments.
>Of course, single issue and local parties do exist, and they do good work towards raising awareness, but in terms of effecting policy change in central government, I don't think they're as effective as NGOs.
Well, I was thinking about a national, multi-issue party anyway. :-)
>Now with NGOs, it depends what you want for yourself. I personally felt that a mixture of direct lobbying of world leaders and nationwide or international awareness-raising campaigns was likely to have the most success, and so I plumped for making regular, if modest, financial contributions to an international environment-oriented NGO. Most NGOs will offer you a chance to be more directly involved in raising awareness, petitioning government officials or fundraising. If you really feel a need to be part of the group steering the NGO,
No, not really. I don't think I'm much of a leader - and that kind of thing tends to eat your life. I'd just like to do my little bit, somewhere. (E.g. I'm currently doing some proofreading for 350.org. Couple of hours per week, and it makes their German website more 'readable', makes it communicate more clearly - seems like a fairly good investment of my time. :-))
>however, it would be easier to opt for a smaller, perhaps local group. The trade-off is that their reach wouldn't be quite as broad - although they may be remarkably successful in their community.
Yeah, see, I can't think of a local group around here. Except for a very NIMBY-type anti-airport group. I approve of their efforts, but their focus (which is on avoiding the expansion of the Frankfurt airport, for a variety of reasons - local environment and health concerns, noise, property values etc.) is really far too narrow.
>Above all of that, you should research the platforms of various likely parties and NGOs, and decide which one you really feel you can commit yourself to.
Yeah, already done that, actually. Just still undecided. One thing I find difficult is to decide where one may potentially do more good.
Reply
Leave a comment