(no subject)
interview with Matthew Graham about this weekend’s episode.
>>It was just that, with the story I needed to tell, there was no point in overcomplicating it in terms of structure. I think what’s going to be a lot of fun about this story is that <...> complexities that comes out of the story are moral and social complexities rather than timey whimey stuff.
So there didn’t seem to be any point in telling the story backwards, or throwing structural curveballs at the audience. It’s a big enough challenge for writers to just tell a good solid story in real time. Everything is in right the right order.
... i have a question there. WHY THEN SHOULD IT BE THE DOCTOR WHO EPISODE? i like timey whimey D: but i do adore the idea of a good solid story. and I LOVE moral and social complexities (excluding the ones in the JE - i hated them, i do hate them still. but then again. it was poorly executed, and i believe if they were made better i'd love them)
and thank you very much for not believing in structural curveballs for the idea of structural curveballs :D
and he talked about working with Steven Moffat! isn't it INTERESTING? *_*_*_*_* ПЫЩ ПЫЩ ПЫЩ
*goes wild and happy* i love inside view thank you very much.
>>"My first reaction was, “Avatar, well, isn’t it going to be a bit like we’re just ripping off the big movie of the moment?” And he said, “Well, that’s your problem. Go away and don’t do that.”"
I LOVE YOU, HEARTLESS BASTARD (it's sort of my nickname for moffat. sorry) *_____*
but then he's like "wait. they should do this. and look like that. yeah, and they are that way." really. really. do whatever you want to, dear friend >.<
>> I had this Name Of The Rose vibe in my head.
i just went off and did completely crazy dance i do for every unrelated rose mention :D i'm sorry.
>>You try very hard to put in Mattisms, if you see what I mean. But you also try not to overdo the Mattisms. It’s a balance. Sometimes you get it right; sometimes you think, “Maybe I’ve overdone the Mattisms here.”
LOL, :333333
>> Steven was very clear. He said scare them. Right from the start.
распечатать и повесить в рамочку :D
Read more: Doctor Who "The Rebel Flesh” Writer Interview - SFX http://www.sfx.co.uk/2011/05/19/doctor-who-the-rebel-flesh%e2%80%9d-writer-interview/#ixzz1MoNQBYrO
i'm actually pretty excited. i was so set against Fear Her in the first place (knowing that it was a replacement for a Stephen Fry episode does wake up a bitch inside me, but then... i really did enjoy it. The man is brilliant, he has nice characterisations, i loved independent rose and i loved edible ball bearings. it was sweet ans simple and everything i needed before the Doomsday.
>>It was just that, with the story I needed to tell, there was no point in overcomplicating it in terms of structure. I think what’s going to be a lot of fun about this story is that <...> complexities that comes out of the story are moral and social complexities rather than timey whimey stuff.
So there didn’t seem to be any point in telling the story backwards, or throwing structural curveballs at the audience. It’s a big enough challenge for writers to just tell a good solid story in real time. Everything is in right the right order.
... i have a question there. WHY THEN SHOULD IT BE THE DOCTOR WHO EPISODE? i like timey whimey D: but i do adore the idea of a good solid story. and I LOVE moral and social complexities (excluding the ones in the JE - i hated them, i do hate them still. but then again. it was poorly executed, and i believe if they were made better i'd love them)
and thank you very much for not believing in structural curveballs for the idea of structural curveballs :D
and he talked about working with Steven Moffat! isn't it INTERESTING? *_*_*_*_* ПЫЩ ПЫЩ ПЫЩ
*goes wild and happy* i love inside view thank you very much.
>>"My first reaction was, “Avatar, well, isn’t it going to be a bit like we’re just ripping off the big movie of the moment?” And he said, “Well, that’s your problem. Go away and don’t do that.”"
I LOVE YOU, HEARTLESS BASTARD (it's sort of my nickname for moffat. sorry) *_____*
but then he's like "wait. they should do this. and look like that. yeah, and they are that way." really. really. do whatever you want to, dear friend >.<
>> I had this Name Of The Rose vibe in my head.
i just went off and did completely crazy dance i do for every unrelated rose mention :D i'm sorry.
>>You try very hard to put in Mattisms, if you see what I mean. But you also try not to overdo the Mattisms. It’s a balance. Sometimes you get it right; sometimes you think, “Maybe I’ve overdone the Mattisms here.”
LOL, :333333
>> Steven was very clear. He said scare them. Right from the start.
распечатать и повесить в рамочку :D
Read more: Doctor Who "The Rebel Flesh” Writer Interview - SFX http://www.sfx.co.uk/2011/05/19/doctor-who-the-rebel-flesh%e2%80%9d-writer-interview/#ixzz1MoNQBYrO
i'm actually pretty excited. i was so set against Fear Her in the first place (knowing that it was a replacement for a Stephen Fry episode does wake up a bitch inside me, but then... i really did enjoy it. The man is brilliant, he has nice characterisations, i loved independent rose and i loved edible ball bearings. it was sweet ans simple and everything i needed before the Doomsday.