papers papers papers
so i just go the "official" word that my InterPACK paper was accepted, with minor revisions.
it's funny... cuz it's just a conference paper. which are almost always accepted based on an abstract. but for some reason the ASME seems to think they need to make themselves more reputable, i suppose.
but i got this note, from one of the anonymous reviewers, saying that it was an "excellent paper" with a "creative approach"... and if i ever did any experimental validation it would make an excellent journal article.
huh.
didn't think it was that good, actually.
but the good news is, the more journals you publish, the harder it is for your committee to fail you. cuz, ya know, if you've been accepted by the technical community, they can't say shit. so i guess i should get on that then.
well that's what eindhoven would be for. :)
it's funny... cuz it's just a conference paper. which are almost always accepted based on an abstract. but for some reason the ASME seems to think they need to make themselves more reputable, i suppose.
but i got this note, from one of the anonymous reviewers, saying that it was an "excellent paper" with a "creative approach"... and if i ever did any experimental validation it would make an excellent journal article.
huh.
didn't think it was that good, actually.
but the good news is, the more journals you publish, the harder it is for your committee to fail you. cuz, ya know, if you've been accepted by the technical community, they can't say shit. so i guess i should get on that then.
well that's what eindhoven would be for. :)