I just got an email from AO3 - because my meta was reported by an unhappy Sherlock fan, the AO3 team had to review it, and they seem to have decided that they want to be a fanfiction-only site and that I have to remove it.
So, to anyone who hasn't downloaded my Study in Pink rewatch yet, and wants to. You have ~16 hours before I delete it. It is
(
Read more... )
I do it too though...I hate it when people call their reaction/review posts "meta" (which is why I don't label my "Quick Reaction" posts as meta). That's not an indepth study of the episode/character/theme, that's just an emotional response and ungathered thoughts.
I was even loathe to call my rewatches meta. You may notice that none of my SPN rewatches are tagged "meta", because I still don't think I'm talking about the show indepthly enough to deserve that label.
With my Study in Pink rewatch sitting at over 14,000 words though, I decided that it was less of a "reaction" and more of a "meta on character motivations and personalities as revealed in A Study in Pink plus general thoughts on the adaptation" (I just went with a shorter title :P)
So yeah, if I ran a meta site, I'd be constantly seeing people post things there that I didn't believe were "proper meta"...but then whether I asked them to take it down or not is another question, I suppose. I mean, I can't really get mad at people for defining "meta" differently than I do, just like I can't get made at AO3 if they don't see meta as being a "fanwork". FYI: This is the part of the TOS they quoted me:
Our Terms of Service, Section IV, part H, state in part:
H. Illegal and inappropriate content:
The Archive of Our Own is a place for fanworks… Content may not be uploaded to OTW’s servers if it …consists entirely of actual instruction manuals, technical data, recipes, or other non-fanwork content, including non-fanwork creative work. Uploading such content is a violation of the ToS.
(Emphasis is theirs)
Reply
I hate that fanwork and non-fanwork are such broad categories. They get to decide what's a fanwork and which kinds of fanworks they'll allow...and for a group that touts openness and an interest in fans and their creations, it's just really disappointing to me. I'm very invested in things like OTW and Dreamwidth, things that open doors, so it's a big deal for me when I see either limiting their services and what can be posted.
Reply
Also, good idea with the different types of meta! Haha, I had never thought of that. *now I feel kind of ridiculously stupid*
Reply
Evidence suggests that this is a CANONICAL FUCKING TAG. With fourteen hundred works.
Reply
But whatever. *shrug* It's not worth arguing about, at least, not for me anyway.
Reply
Reply
Reply
ETA: Wow, what's it like to have started such a discourse about this stuff?
Reply
I mean, when I first got the angry comments from AO3 users, I was pissed off an up-in-arms about it. (But I think that was mainly the fault of the commenters tone - and also the fact that they really had no right to tell me how to use the site, since there was no mention that meta wasn't allowed in the TOS).
But, after writing to AO3 and receiving emails about it from them, I wasn't really angry anymore...I'm perfectly respectful of whatever decision they come to. It's their site and their decision, and I CAN see the argument for not allowing meta just as much as I can see the argument for allowing it.
So, it feels sort of funny to have started the discourse even though I'm not rage-shouting about it. Usually this sort of discourse is started by people who are much angrier than I am. :P
Anyway, I will keep you updated! :)
Reply
Reply
Reply
http://fail-fandomanon.livejournal.com/37106.html?thread=165792498#t165792498
Reply
The fuck?
Reply
Maybe when I have time later, I'll see if there's a setting somewhere that I can change. It's not like I get much spam here that I have to worry about.
Reply
You can change that setting here - just uncheck the "Spam Protection" box. (The special section they're talking about is here in your Inbox.)
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment