This is kinda wrong in my opinion.
http://news.aol.com/article/georgia-schools-says-jonathan-escobar/707800?icid=main|aim|dl1|link2|http%3A%2F%2Fnews.aol.com%2Farticle%2Fgeorgia-schools-says-jonathan-escobar%2F707800
I can see the schools side, because it is disruptive, BUT the thing is, its not his fault his style disrupts other students.
I can see making him not wear wigs because in my former school, NOTHING can cover your head unless its religious... and nobody did that.
And my school went as far putting 'gender appropriate' in the dresscode.
BUT, its not right for them to try and say 'dress manly' ... girls wear boys clothes, why can't boys wear girls clothes?
If it's 'gender appropriate' then girls would have to wear ONLY girls shirts, only girls pants/skirts/dresses, and ONLY girls shoes... I wore mens teeshirts and men's shoes, and now a days, jeans aren't really gender-defined anymore, are they?
Idk, what do you guys think?
I can see the schools side, because it is disruptive, BUT the thing is, its not his fault his style disrupts other students.
I can see making him not wear wigs because in my former school, NOTHING can cover your head unless its religious... and nobody did that.
And my school went as far putting 'gender appropriate' in the dresscode.
BUT, its not right for them to try and say 'dress manly' ... girls wear boys clothes, why can't boys wear girls clothes?
If it's 'gender appropriate' then girls would have to wear ONLY girls shirts, only girls pants/skirts/dresses, and ONLY girls shoes... I wore mens teeshirts and men's shoes, and now a days, jeans aren't really gender-defined anymore, are they?
Idk, what do you guys think?