Photoz.

[heartbyheart]

To see pictures that I've been taking with my fabulous new camera, there are daily highlights in ye olde arte blogge and enough photos to choke an elephant over on FlickrI have a 4GB memory card now, which means I will be spending the rest of my life editing photos. Holy hell, 98 photos from the MFA today and I'm only about half way through them 2

Comments

[donutgirl]

ooh, the jewelry exhibit looks a lot like the Lalique exhibit I saw a while ago... loverly.

If you're looking for more subjects, may I recommend the ICA? I went last weekend and severely regretted not bringing my camera. The building is beyond gorgeous, and I think you might enjoy the Anish Kapoor exhibit on until the 7th.

[heartbyheart]

Problem with ICA and anything contemporary is that photography is usually a big no-no since anything post 1908 is still under copyright protection. It'd be awesome to GO anyway, but the camera wouldn't have very much fun.

I've heard mixed reviews of the ICA. Well, actually, I've heard mostly negative reviews. Yours is the first positive one! I wonder what exactly people are objecting to. C'mon, guys! It's art! How bad can it be?

[donutgirl]

No, I meant for you to photograph the *building*. That's perfectly legal, and the building is beautiful. Anyone who disagrees probably has no taste for contemporary architecture.

[heartbyheart]

Ah, yes. THE BUILDING. Der. Don't mind me, I rode in on the short bus.

[donutgirl]

The permanent collection at the ICA is not mind-blowing, I'll concede, although there were a few interesting pieces. But the Anish Kapoor exhibit was terrific. If the negative reviews you heard were in regards to that exhibit, then... those people have no soul. IMO. ;)

[heartbyheart]

Nah, the reviews were about the permanent collection. Rest assured, the souls of my artsy friends are still intact! Well, mostly intact.