from andrew sullivan (via indexed---> indexed.blogspot.com. um. fantastic.) , who i desperately need to stop spending hours reading when i have the office to myself at work, because it leaves me a fiending, raging political junkie scouring alleys of every political blog and news source for my next fix.
also from the daily dish,
"A reader writes:
The Couric interview reminded me of an episode in the 5th grade when I tried to fake my way through an oral presentation on a book I hadn’t read. Neither of us pulled it off."
oh, and let's just do it, insult, meet injury:
“It’s not based on any particular data point,” a Treasury spokeswoman told Forbes.com Tuesday. “We just wanted to choose a really large number.”
um, sorry, !!!!!...???..?!?!?!!!
all of this has recent absurdity has left me reeling, but the couric/palin interview? nauseates my soul. (further evidence of a. sullivan's ballerness: his first post on the interview was simply a clip from that miss south carolina who, when asked about why many americans couldn't locate the US on a map, went on an excruitating ramble with south africa and iraq tossed in a jumble of words that made that britney spears "HUH?!" video look like a jfk speech.)
night. mare.
uh, on another note, can someone tell me how the HELL to work "snap shots." im starting to feel like my mom over here, technologically speaking.