Found this article via
sylvanawood's post in
dh_oh_shit. It’s chock full of spoilers, so don’t read it unless you’ve finished Deathly Hallows, but it expresses eloquently and succinctly something I think a lot of us feel about Snape.
Missing from ‘Harry Potter’ - a real moral struggle Oh, and how does Rowling feel about Snape now?
(
DH Spoilers in Rant Under the Cut )
Comments 47
Writing is a form of communication, and all successful communication is a process of negotiation between individuals. Though a speaker (or author) may have intended to communicate one thing, what was in fact communicated to and understood by the listener (or reader) is often beyond the power of the speaker (or author) to control.
Reply
Reply
At this point I've decided that I won't consider her interviews canon. I'm rather upset with her right now.
Reply
Even if you outline and have an epilogue as a goal, plot and characters change under your fingertips--this is what I thought might have happened to JKR with Snape.
So what Rowling *says* is not canon. Just like whatever Roddenbury (Trek's creator and first producer) says is not canon. That's the way it is in the other fandoms I know of--but then other fandoms don't make you repeat an author's mistakes in grammar, hyphenization, and capitalization to be "canon compliant."
What's canon is what is in the books--and that Snape is a hero--not a "deeply horrible man."
Reply
When I was part of the sleuthing side of things we took everything she said and wrote to be canon. Then, when she opened her website, everything there was canon as well.
That is no longer my opinion.
Please tell me, why is it that Minerva is too old to be headmistress of Hogwarts 19 yrs after DH? JKR said she was 70 or so... and didn't she also say that DD was nearly 150?
Even if you outline and have an epilogue as a goal, plot and characters change under your fingertips--this is what I thought might have happened to JKR with Snape.Hear! Hear ( ... )
Reply
Well, that's the other thing that leaves room for fanfic. The contradictions, the paradoxes, and the things that just don't make sense.
Funny, but in Trek my specialty was writing stories from the point of view of villains and making heroes of them. But that's the fun of fanfic so often. I have a lot of problems with HP culture and the moderated archives but in the end I think my problem comes down to people trying to exert far too much control.
Fanfic is not about control. It's about creativity. Its about using canon rather than following it.
Even if Rowling had said--"Yes, Snape is a hero", you know she would never have said:
Yes, well, Hermione was on that platform because she didn't trust Ron to drive the kids. They've actually long been divorced and she's married to Snape now. I wrote that death by Nagini scene so that you all could find ways he could ( ... )
Reply
My poor stretch at a positive interpretation of her words... strictly speaking, I don't think Snape is a hero. He's an anti-hero, and, to my mind, one of the most striking ever written.
Reply
Reply
Yes, yes, yes, yes, YES! Thank you for pointing out the single greatest thing for showing that Snape isn't the drip JKR keeps saying he is.
Reply
But then, I'm still seeing some readers claiming that Snape was just probably playing both sides, and edited what got shown to Harry.
::headdesk::
Reply
Snape was a bully and a petty man in many ways, but he worked hard for his redemption. For her to brush that off is puzzling to me.
Reply
I'm in the minority on my f-list in actually loving the last book, but that may have been because of my low expectations--I had feared she wouldn't do as I'd been expecting her to since HBP--show that Snape was on the right side.
So when she not only had Snape still working against Voldemort, but as we guessed had it all be because of Dumbledore's own orders, when she showed such depth of emotion and feeling in him for Lily, when she had Harry say it didn't matter if his son was in Slytherin, named his son for Snape, called Snape the "bravest man" he'd ever known, I thought Rowling "got it."
Apparently not...
Reply
I think it's her world-building that made HP special.
I think so. Her adverb use was pared down in DH, so she has learned, but there was still some cringe-worthy prose that slipped through, and there were still some rather large plot holes. However, she still turned out an entertaining book.
Apparently not...
It's been surprising to me to learn that she created such a multi-layered character almost by accident. ~shakes head~
Reply
Reply
Does that mean I think what she wrote is "bad fanfic?" No. I can think of a bare handful of fanficwriters that match Rowling in terms of intricacy of plot over hundreds of thousands of words and only one I can think of that might very well match Rowling in world-building someday. After all, my f-list is made up of a community of people who read and write fanfic based on Rowling's world. Who are a bit *cough* obsessed. Seems to me she didn't do so shabby.
And we shouldn't expect her to write the book we wanted. So, fair enough. In her eyes Snape is still a horrible man with nothing admirable about him. That's her opinion and she's entitled to it.
But it's still not canon despite her authorship. Canon is what is *in* the book we play with between the lines. If I wanted to follow canon rather than use it I'd be ( ... )
Reply
Leave a comment