Haha, no girlfriend can contain their true nature. Forced het is awkward and will just make the boys fondle each other more. ♥
Crushing tween dreams is a bad thing?Agreed. Nick is probably just hoping the first generation to fantasize about being Mrs. Diamond is old enough not to explode when he's allowed to reveal his preference for rooster. XD
( ... )
I KNOW! *ushers you into her forced!het bomb shelter* We'll be safe in here!
Exactly...it should be read as "Big Time Boyfriends" who hang out with the girls so they can yell "You GO girlfriend!" or gossip about their big time boyfriends, and how they are big...big time. XD
It is? :D I don't know if that's the name of the character as well, or just the actress, but hurray for getting to be associated in some fashion!
Me too. When I first heard that name, I said, "Well that's ridiculously fitting." Given that they were originally going to have different character names, Fellows noted that he started to write the characters to fit the boys cast, and the fact that James along with Logan was in the first round cast at the beginning of the two year assemblage, I think it's a fair assessment that the last name was assigned to fit James's real life sparkle. XD
I was looking through new apps in the Entertainment section and in the corner where it shows other apps done by that person/group, it showed the BTR one. I was OMG! I (kinda) know what that is! Found it very funny :)
Bwahaha, that's amazing! I don't have an iPhone, so I've never been to their store and didn't realize they were grouped in those sections. I'm so glad you saw it and shared--it totally cracked me up when I saw it! :)
Better to leave the boys to non-committed flirting, romance antics, and the occasional date or two. - AGREED.
That statement sums up most (not all) high school dating. And since the boys are technically in high school, or at least at that age, they shouldn't be thrown into a serious relationship. The teenage years are a time for exploration, to see where one fits socially, what one likes, and who one likes, so run off into the jungle and explore boys! And by that I mean, yes, explore each other James and Logan. ^_^
Exactly! The majority of teens are not entering into a serious relationship, though it may feel like it at the time and could have lasting impact on their life in terms of teaching them what they want and don't want in a relationship.
Seriously, I wish they'd just let the boys be boys! The sooner Scott Fellows stops fighting their overwhelming need to sparkle, the better off he'll be. He let plenty of sparkling happen in Ned's, even if it wasn't the main focus, so I'm hoping he'll allow what is far sparklier by nature to continue as the focus. :)
Man, how did I keep missing these comments?! I did recently discover that my notifications had randomly been delivered haphazardly to spam or inbox...*growls* So, I'm going through my journal itself to hunt them down.
Agreed. I've seen a lot of progress in other children's programming. I mean, heck, Arthur and Barbar both featured gay animal couples didn't they? They weren't a main focus, but they were mentioned in passing. Honesty, I don't know what Nick's excuse is given that they air Degrassi, which has had same sex story lines of varying degrees of gravitas, and Drake and Josh used to kiss on the lips, even if it wasn't supposed to be "romantic" they still showed a on-the-lips, same-sex kiss between unrelated boys; they also danced the tango and said things like "Don't ever put your finger in me again." I mean, come on! Why not BTR? They did include a kiss between Gustavo and Marcos though, which made me smile. When I was flipping through the channels, I managed to catch a small bit of Victorious where one of the characters
( ... )
Comments 36
(The comment has been removed)
Crushing tween dreams is a bad thing?Agreed. Nick is probably just hoping the first generation to fantasize about being Mrs. Diamond is old enough not to explode when he's allowed to reveal his preference for rooster. XD ( ... )
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
(The comment has been removed)
clearly production has made a mistake and it's susposed to read "big time boyfriends" clearly *nods*
that's my name :D yay! i get to be associated with BTR in some way XD
i just need to say that i have a ridiculous love of james's last name, even it's something that sparkles XDDD
Reply
Exactly...it should be read as "Big Time Boyfriends" who hang out with the girls so they can yell "You GO girlfriend!" or gossip about their big time boyfriends, and how they are big...big time. XD
It is? :D I don't know if that's the name of the character as well, or just the actress, but hurray for getting to be associated in some fashion!
Me too. When I first heard that name, I said, "Well that's ridiculously fitting." Given that they were originally going to have different character names, Fellows noted that he started to write the characters to fit the boys cast, and the fact that James along with Logan was in the first round cast at the beginning of the two year assemblage, I think it's a fair assessment that the last name was assigned to fit James's real life sparkle. XD
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
That statement sums up most (not all) high school dating. And since the boys are technically in high school, or at least at that age, they shouldn't be thrown into a serious relationship. The teenage years are a time for exploration, to see where one fits socially, what one likes, and who one likes, so run off into the jungle and explore boys! And by that I mean, yes, explore each other James and Logan. ^_^
Reply
Seriously, I wish they'd just let the boys be boys! The sooner Scott Fellows stops fighting their overwhelming need to sparkle, the better off he'll be. He let plenty of sparkling happen in Ned's, even if it wasn't the main focus, so I'm hoping he'll allow what is far sparklier by nature to continue as the focus. :)
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Agreed. I've seen a lot of progress in other children's programming. I mean, heck, Arthur and Barbar both featured gay animal couples didn't they? They weren't a main focus, but they were mentioned in passing. Honesty, I don't know what Nick's excuse is given that they air Degrassi, which has had same sex story lines of varying degrees of gravitas, and Drake and Josh used to kiss on the lips, even if it wasn't supposed to be "romantic" they still showed a on-the-lips, same-sex kiss between unrelated boys; they also danced the tango and said things like "Don't ever put your finger in me again." I mean, come on! Why not BTR? They did include a kiss between Gustavo and Marcos though, which made me smile. When I was flipping through the channels, I managed to catch a small bit of Victorious where one of the characters ( ... )
Reply
Leave a comment