I'm feeling totally avoidant about RL, so instead, here's a smorgasbord of things that are not RL -- reading, watching, and listening roundup, such as it is:
1. Katherine Addison, The Angel of the Crows -- so, funny story: K was excited about this book just on the strength of the author's name, but then I looked it up and was like, "...are you sure
(
Read more... )
Thanks!
...they teased the multiverse too with Spider-Man: Homecoming...
Sounds like I should brave giving it a viewing. I've been avoiding it partly out of my reluctance to watch MCU stuff post-Endgame and partly because Spider-Man was my late father's favorite character so watching Spider-Man stuff without him brings up feels completely apart from whatever happens in the story.
Fair enough! (and I'm sorry about the traumatic storyline)
It's the biggest reason I had mixed feelings (equal parts excitement and dread) when they announced they were bringing Wanda into the MCU. She's my favorite Avenger, I wanted to see her on-screen, but I knew they wouldn't be able to have her be Magneto's daughter, and if they brought her in they might put her through that kind of Hell on screen.
Ah, interesting!
It's been used a lot so it isn't always evil, but it's been evil often enough that it's fair to be suspicious of it.
I've been independently wondering ... whether the hex energy of Wanda's Westview bubble is going to be the thing that starts triggering mutations in people and that's how you get mutants in the MCU.
Interesting. It would be a sort of reverse of "M-Day" (comic book storyline where Wanda depowered most mutants).
That definitely did not come across to me in the movies, but then, Rhodey hasn't been in them a whole lot.
Given I can't remember it having come up in the MCU before, it might only be established in the MCU if he shows up with those credentials in the show, or it could be comic book fans projecting something from the books onto the MCU version they aren't even going to use. I'm only sure about him being an aerospace engineer in the comics.
Reply
Mmm, I'm not sure, actually, with what you say -- I enjoyed the movie a lot, but don't think it would be satisfying just based on the multiverse tease (to go into more detail would be spoilery; let me know if you want me to do that). It is very much a post-Endgame movie -- a lot of it deals with the aftermath of the Blip (mostly but not completely jokily) and with the aftermath of Tony's sacrifice (very seriously) -- it's almost like an epilogue to Endgame.
And I didn't think it was as good as the first Tom Holland Spider-Man movie, although admittedly my expectations were a lot higher this time around, going in.
Interesting. It would be a sort of reverse of "M-Day" (comic book storyline where Wanda depowered most mutants).
Yeah, I've heard a lot of speculation that this might be what WandaVision (or Wanda's arc in general) is leading up to, since there have not been any mutants in the MCU for purely legal reasons which have now been removed, so, a "poof, mutants now!" storyline would be awfully convenient :)
Reply
When you put it like that it sounds like I might have had the right idea avoiding it in the first place.
Yeah, I've heard a lot of speculation that this might be what WandaVision (or Wanda's arc in general) is leading up to...
I hadn't thought about it, but I can see how they might want to explain suddenly having mutants instead of trying to pretend there have been mutants the whole time unseen. I mean in the books Wanda and Pietro were mutant Avengers back in the 60's as soon as they left the Brotherhood of Evil Mutants.
Reply
Leave a comment