1. Con independencia de la notificación personal, las resoluciones sancionadoras de los órganos de justicia federativa se publicarán íntegramente en el portal web de la RFEF.
2. Ello no obstante, dichas resoluciones no producirán efectos para los interesados hasta su notificación personal.
3. Las notificaciones a los jugadores, entrenadores, técnicos, delegados y directivos podrá realizarse en el club o SAD al que pertenezcan en cada momento. La misma, será válida a todos los efectos.
Art. 41,2 basically says that for a decision to take effect persons involved must be personally notified. Art. 41,3 then goes on to expand on what will be understod as a personal notification, i.e. notifying the club.
Villarreal was the club who held Denis' registration at the time of the imposition of the sanction and they were notified on March 6th. As soon as that happened the sanction took effect and remained in effect until it was either served or the statute of limitations expired. Real Madrid had no right to be notified and if either RFEF or Villarreal chose to do so it would be purely out of courtesy. And RFEF actually did chose to do so and send us a list of players with outstanding bans for this season's CdR, twice. One in July and one in August. Cadiz requested a list of players banned for the first (well, fourth, our first) round on the day of the match and Denis was on it. We didn't even think to ask. A retired ref who works as an analyst noticed it when the squad was announced. He tried to call RM, was told to send a fax, did so and then called back to make certain they had received it. He was then told not to worry, someone would contact him if they had any questions.
Our grand defense consists of pretending like art. 41,3 simply doesn't exist (literally - at one of the press briefings the club showed a slide that only showed the first two clauses, they'd simply removed the third one) and that as long as Villar himself didn't get in his car and went to Denis' house to notify him personally then the sanction is not in effect. This is what the judge thought of that defense: Real Madrid's forced and flimsy argument based on a limited and biased interpretation of article 41 of the RFEF's Disciplinary Code does not stand up. And that was before he really got warmed up. In short, we have no case. Zero, zip, nada, none.
Anyway, I hope that made sense and I hope you feel better asap!! How's life treating you otherwise?
Artículo 41. Comunicación pública.
1. Con independencia de la notificación personal, las resoluciones
sancionadoras de los órganos de justicia federativa se publicarán íntegramente en el
portal web de la RFEF.
2. Ello no obstante, dichas resoluciones no producirán efectos para los
interesados hasta su notificación personal.
3. Las notificaciones a los jugadores, entrenadores, técnicos, delegados y
directivos podrá realizarse en el club o SAD al que pertenezcan en cada momento. La
misma, será válida a todos los efectos.
Art. 41,2 basically says that for a decision to take effect persons involved must be personally notified. Art. 41,3 then goes on to expand on what will be understod as a personal notification, i.e. notifying the club.
Villarreal was the club who held Denis' registration at the time of the imposition of the sanction and they were notified on March 6th. As soon as that happened the sanction took effect and remained in effect until it was either served or the statute of limitations expired. Real Madrid had no right to be notified and if either RFEF or Villarreal chose to do so it would be purely out of courtesy. And RFEF actually did chose to do so and send us a list of players with outstanding bans for this season's CdR, twice. One in July and one in August. Cadiz requested a list of players banned for the first (well, fourth, our first) round on the day of the match and Denis was on it. We didn't even think to ask. A retired ref who works as an analyst noticed it when the squad was announced. He tried to call RM, was told to send a fax, did so and then called back to make certain they had received it. He was then told not to worry, someone would contact him if they had any questions.
Our grand defense consists of pretending like art. 41,3 simply doesn't exist (literally - at one of the press briefings the club showed a slide that only showed the first two clauses, they'd simply removed the third one) and that as long as Villar himself didn't get in his car and went to Denis' house to notify him personally then the sanction is not in effect. This is what the judge thought of that defense: Real Madrid's forced and flimsy argument based on a limited and biased interpretation of article 41 of the RFEF's Disciplinary Code does not stand up. And that was before he really got warmed up. In short, we have no case. Zero, zip, nada, none.
Anyway, I hope that made sense and I hope you feel better asap!! How's life treating you otherwise?
Reply
Leave a comment