fuuuuuuuuuuuu the grey one with neon green, i hope those are legit because
it reminds me of the color scheme that the seahawks & their goods have going for it and it just works for me tbh. i don't give a shit about seattle but damn son their colors make me wish i was a fan. soooo PLEASE DO THE GREY/NEON GREEN MADRID.
also, i wonder what it was about the renovation plan that really made them veto it, considering they went with this blanket statement of "was not made in the best interests of the general public." was it the fact that it is so tied up in investors that flo was gonna let sponsors put their banners over the roof of the hotel?? or the shopping mall that would probs cost a fortune??? hmmmt
also, i wonder what it was about the renovation plan that really made them veto it, considering they went with this blanket statement of "was not made in the best interests of the general public." was it the fact that it is so tied up in investors that flo was gonna let sponsors put their banners over the roof of the hotel?? or the shopping mall that would probs cost a fortune??? hmmmt
Neither. The court annulled the changes to the city's planning laws and the land exchange between the city and the club that made the renovation possible. Esp. the inclusion of plots of land originally expropriated by the city in order to build social housing fell foul of the whole "public benefit" thing. You can read the full decision here: http://www.nuevoestadiobernabeu.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/DOC110215-11022015134904.pdf
That decision and esp. the description of the land deals, makes me pretty concerned the EC is going to find that it was a case of illegal state aid and oh joy, the press would just love that.
how interesting, thanks for the link to the decision! i'll probably read through it later when i'm on my break. i am literally gasping with joy at the idea of the media having another field day with something RM has done.
it reminds me of the color scheme that the seahawks & their goods have going for it and it just works for me tbh. i don't give a shit about seattle but damn son their colors make me wish i was a fan. soooo PLEASE DO THE GREY/NEON GREEN MADRID.
also, i wonder what it was about the renovation plan that really made them veto it, considering they went with this blanket statement of "was not made in the best interests of the general public." was it the fact that it is so tied up in investors that flo was gonna let sponsors put their banners over the roof of the hotel?? or the shopping mall that would probs cost a fortune??? hmmmt
Reply
Neither. The court annulled the changes to the city's planning laws and the land exchange between the city and the club that made the renovation possible. Esp. the inclusion of plots of land originally expropriated by the city in order to build social housing fell foul of the whole "public benefit" thing. You can read the full decision here: http://www.nuevoestadiobernabeu.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/DOC110215-11022015134904.pdf
That decision and esp. the description of the land deals, makes me pretty concerned the EC is going to find that it was a case of illegal state aid and oh joy, the press would just love that.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment