Yesterday was Aaralyn's two month birthday. If that's a birthday. Two months old! I really wanted to give her a cupcake with a candle but I didn't think that that would be a good thing. And there's really no way to gussy up formula to make it more appealing, at least not to my knowledge, so instead I just used it as an excuse to get her all dolled
(
Read more... )
Comments 15
This kind of sounds like the old "if a tree falls in the forest" anecdote. The version of this idea I find myself leaning on the most though, is that we have low points in our life so that we can better appreciate the highs. At least I think that jibes with what you're getting at.
Reply
Reply
Reply
I want to keep her this way for always. Maybe that's why I'm taking so many pictures.
Reply
Reply
Believe it or no you are not the only one who teases me with stories of teenage kids ;)
Reply
The oldest symbols are religious, but the oldest profession pushes a different kind of fulfillment. There's bipolarity in most things, and I'd argue some might not need that something spiritual. They just don't erect statues or create symbols indicating their lack of need, because a vacuum needs no representation.
Reply
You really think that there are people who genuinely never need/yearn/want for something more than the physical? The mundane? I don't see how that could be possible, myself. We see wantings like that substantiated every day. I mean, that's what depression is. It's what a mid-life crisis is. It's what church-goers do. It's what unhappy millionaires do. Where do you think teenage angst comes from? And especially now that we're getting worn so thin between things, you know? That's the thing, there isn't a vacuum. We've been just about as close to genetically programmed towards the spiritual realm as you can get. Maybe people don't see it through statues or physical manifestations/symbols, but that doesn't mean they don't seek it out other ways.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Well the tree falling thing is more along the lines of things existing because of witness. And the heat/cold example was probably more along the lines of values only existing because of spectrums along which they could be judged. I guess the 'we wouldn't get hungry if there wasn't food' is probably the closest to what I was actually trying to say.
And stupidity and stubbornness are perfectly applicable, it was a good tangent ;)
I miss it already. Do you think that's bad? God I miss it.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment