random trivia
So I was arguing with a friend over which beatle was best and I came up with this somewhat interesting factoid.
Of the beatles' #1 hit songs
John was lead vocals on: 15 of them
Paul was lead vocals on: 11 of them
Ringo was lead vocals on: 1.
George was lead guitar on all of them.
Ergo. Paul is not the best beatle. Also, Lennon continued to rule after the beatles, and paul eats dick. Ringo is fincancially the most succesful of all four, and George is praised as a guitar god. Billy Preston had a hand in every good thing the beatles ever did.
So no matter how you cut it, Paul is not the greatest beatle. Plus, he sings like he has a thick ball of ejaculate in the back of his throat.
Beatles coulda been the toppermost of the poppermost without him. All you need is witty, talented writing lead singer, sweet guitarwork, and a drummer that is so cute when he tried to drum that you can ignore the fact that he has no talent.
Of the beatles' #1 hit songs
John was lead vocals on: 15 of them
Paul was lead vocals on: 11 of them
Ringo was lead vocals on: 1.
George was lead guitar on all of them.
Ergo. Paul is not the best beatle. Also, Lennon continued to rule after the beatles, and paul eats dick. Ringo is fincancially the most succesful of all four, and George is praised as a guitar god. Billy Preston had a hand in every good thing the beatles ever did.
So no matter how you cut it, Paul is not the greatest beatle. Plus, he sings like he has a thick ball of ejaculate in the back of his throat.
Beatles coulda been the toppermost of the poppermost without him. All you need is witty, talented writing lead singer, sweet guitarwork, and a drummer that is so cute when he tried to drum that you can ignore the fact that he has no talent.