"I personally believe it’s antifamily, and so I am going to vote against it. The problem is this: I have senators that are not going to hire, uh, people with male sexual organs who wear a dress to serve as receptionists, OK? Um, and so if they're not going to do it, if the senators and house members themselves wouldn't hire a person in that
(
Read more... )
"not going to hire, uh, people with male sexual organs who wear a dress to serve as receptionists"
So a person with female sexual organs wearing men's clothing would be A-Ok? /sarcasm.
And I can't read the actual article because the work (a high school) internet filter is blocking it for "Mature Content, Sexual Orientation" Seriously?!
Reply
But hey, at least it wasn't restricted as "immoral lifestyle choice content" or something like that.
Reply
Especially not in private boys schools whose attitudes in many areas are permnanently set to 1950.
It's a pretty messed up filter, it doesn't block Wiki entries with explicit photos of female genitalia (I discovered walking through a health ed class) but try to find out about hoopskirts and you get blocked for looking up lingerie.
Reply
/You have to sit juuuuuuust right...
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
And yet some of the stuff it lets through :S
Reply
Leave a comment