It has come to my attention that some people on this very internet are misusing the Bechdel-Wallace test to an egregious degree. Specifically, they have been asserting that anything that clears this very low bar is a net good for "female representation in media," even if the thing in question is Oz: The Great and Powerful or A Game of Thrones.
(
Read more... )
It wasn't surprising that the focal point character was a white guy, given the kind of movie it is (screenwriters who want to make it big in Hollywood are pretty much told, sometimes in exactly as many words, that the lead in an action movie MUST be a straight, white man, and preferably American). What did surprise me was the barrage of white dudes in secondary roles. The Australians get character development, but the Chinese and Russian pilots don't! Character development about daddy issues! And apparently the triplets were so severely backgrounded that some viewers didn't even notice they were Chinese! The scientists are both white men because apparently no one could find, in all of Asia, a mathematician and a biologist who was also a Kaiju fan! Nope, have to go to Germany for that! The communications officer is played by a white or at least very light-skinned Latino actor, is coded as belonging to a very white US-centric subculture, and is supposed to be half Chinese according to supplementary materials even though the actor is not part Chinese at all, so we have a Ricardo Montalban as Khan type of situation in 2013! And that's still not as cringe-inducing as the actual Star Trek movie that came out the same year, with a white BRITISH actor playing Khan! And if that character had been female, nothing would have had to change, and the movie would have passed the Bechdel test by miles! *sigh*
Reply
i really only noticed them shooting hoops, so... sigh.
i haven't seen ST. just... no, thanks.
Reply
I didn't want to support Star Trek because of the whole white-British-guy-playing-an-Indian-character mess. Then I found out about the underwear scene and was so relieved that I missed that because it's exactly the kind of thing that always leaves me feeling like crap. That's one thing Pacific Rim did right-- it might have had been short on female characters, but it didn't do any of the sexually gross things that upset me in other action/SF movies.
Reply
meh.
i;ve never been a huge ST fan, and a LOT of it is because they seem, on the surface, to be about equality.... but look at Troi's clothing. or other gratuitious things, like underwear scene.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment