A Dead Horse, or maybe i should say, Elephant

[grim81trvr]

Senator Kerry has conceited the race, and Bush has been popularly elected back into the oval office. But what is he planning to do while he is there for the next four years? I took a look around, and i think i found the answer.

Comments

I did a little snooping

[grim81trvr]

I took a look at all of Kerry's speeches that had anything to do with terrorism or nuclear threats, and none of them had anything about war. every one of his speeches on those subjects centered around nuclear disarmament treaties and the "blending down" of enriched uranium and plutonium for use in power reactors. He never said anything about invading anybody, and infact wanted nothing more than to finish this war in Iraq.

New Strategies to Meet New Threats -- June 1, 2004

"At my first summit with the Russian President, I will seek an agreement to sweep aside the key obstacles slowing our efforts to secure Russia’s nuclear stockpiles. But this threat is not limited to the former Soviet Union."

"We must work with the Russians to accelerate the “blending down” of highly enriched uranium and the disposition of Russian plutonium stocks so they can never be used in a nuclear weapon."

He even juxtaposed his views with Bush's:

"Instead of expanding programs to keep weapons of mass destruction in Russia out of terrorist hands... the President first tried to cut the programs… and even after 9/11 did too little to strengthen them. That was the wrong choice."

enough said

Re: I did a little snooping

[sea_aggie_angel]

I am so sick and tired of arguing political views, you think I'm wrong and I think your wrong. I am also tired of the Kerry people crying because they didn't get their way in the election. Get over it, Kerry is not going to be the president, Thank God.

Am i really wrong?

[grim81trvr]

yes, kerry isnt going to be president this term, but im not crying over that. im crying because the fate of this county has been put back into the wrong hands. the simple fact is republicans want things to stay the way they are which is very regressive and it only helps a select few while democrats want to work toward broader horizons that include every person, not the wealthy elite, which is very progressive. how can regressive policies make any progress in a young nation. America has so much influence around the world, and historically, republicans have messed this up, that is why most of the world hates us.

you may think im wrong, but i just want to do the right thing. what is bush going to do for you, for your family and friends, who (correct me if im wrong) arent of the wealthy, estate owning, yachting yuppies of his upperclass elite? hes going to make YOU pay more in taxes, hes going to make YOU carry the burden of America, hes going to make YOU work harder for people who dont deserve your money, because they already have enough of their own.

you may think im wrong, but the fact is that im not presenting opinions, im presenting facts, and facts arent wrong. they are either true or false, and anything that is false is a lie. so i present only true facts.

think about that.

Re: Am i really wrong?

[sea_aggie_angel]

I do think you are wrong but I am not going to keep arguing with you about this. End of freaking argument.... If you want to keep going on then fine keep going, but I am not going to respond to you anymore. I am tired of talking politics. If you do keep going, find someone who cares.