(Untitled)

Jul 16, 2007 16:18

flamingnerd was telling me a few days ago that she doesn't think she knows any other smart guys who are non-Asperger-esque, so when I saw schizokitty post this earlier today, I had to go take the tests to actually see ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Wow, I feel so mostly average. rubricity July 17 2007, 05:29:12 UTC

Your score: 39
0 - 19 = low
20 - 39 = average (most women score about 24 and most men score about 30)
40 - 50 = above average (most people with Asperger Syndrome or high-functioning autism score in this range)
51 - 80 is very high (three times as many people with Asperger Syndrome score in this range, compared to typical men, and almost no women score in this range)
80 is maximum

Your score: 55
0 - 32 = low (most people with Asperger Syndrome or high-functioning autism score about 20)
33 - 52 = average (most women score about 47 and most men score about 42)
53 - 63 is above average
64 - 80 is very high
80 is maximum

Your score: 15
0 - 10 = low
11 - 22 = average (most women score about 15 and most men score about 17)
23 - 31 = above average
32 - 50 is very high (most people with Asperger Syndrome or high-functioning autism score about 35)
50 is maximum

Your score: 33
A typical score is in the range 22-30. If you scored over 30,
you are very accurate at decoding a person's facial expressions
around their eyes. A score under 22 indicates you find this quite difficult.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The correct answers for the ones you missed are:
10: cautious
29: reflective
33: concerned

What does it mean if I am bothered by how some of the questions are structured because I don't don't think the options are the right range? (other than "anal-retentive dork".

I am surprised my systemizing quotient wasn't higher. I am very good at remembering details, small and large, and can be very anal-retentive about things being precise.

Reply

Re: Wow, I feel so mostly average. beaq July 17 2007, 20:45:35 UTC
Perhaps precision and order aren't quite the same thing?

Reply

Re: Wow, I feel so mostly average. gregtitus July 18 2007, 00:27:50 UTC
Yeah. Think of a data plot graph. Precision is placing each data point in the correct place. Order is determining the equation of the curve that best fits the data.

If you systematize really strongly, you drop the data points entirely and reality, to you, is the equation of the curve and not the individual data points.

Reply

Re: Wow, I feel so mostly average. flamingnerd July 18 2007, 15:05:43 UTC
yeah, that's what I thought. I don't usually remember details, answered questions reflecting that and got a pretty high systematizing score. I can usually reconstruct details though :)

Reply


Leave a comment

Up