Hero
Yeah.. my psy book has so many biased comments in it.. and the author is really obnoxious and in your face about it. But, one of the things it said was that Men are more likly to be hero's than women when It comes to going into burning buildings... ect.. but the way the book said it was so rude about it... you know? so I was like.. I mean obviously mean are going to do things that have to to with physical strength because they are naturally stronger than women... but the book made it seem like girls just didn't care to save others and we are all self centered and blah...
that same day after I read that. some girl had locked her keys in her car. So I grabed a hanger thing out of my car and I was like... "now all we need is a guy." using our heads we both broke into her car and she was able to get her keys. she said I was her hero.. and I thought about the book... see... guys break into cars.. thats what they do.. so It would have been more likly for a guy to help her... but then I thought about the other day when my car broke down and I had 3 women helping me and finally one guy came and stoped the traffic and then left w/ out doing anything else.. and I'm like.. hello guys know things about cars.. you wanna help us out. so I think women want to help but guys are just supposed to be our knights in shinning armor so God made so they would be braver and stronger... but girls do have hearts to help.. just arn't always the best canidate to help... then I thought about how they came up with that statment.. where did they get there data.. because seriously both those events prob. would not have been part of the statistics because they wern't big news story's. and most hero's go unnoticed anyway so who are my book authors talking about? does that make sense? I mean guys are more likely to help in certain situations... only because they have the required skills... it has nothing to do with women being inferior or whatever like the book made it seem. So I think Men a women are equally heroic... and my book authors are biased pigs.
that same day after I read that. some girl had locked her keys in her car. So I grabed a hanger thing out of my car and I was like... "now all we need is a guy." using our heads we both broke into her car and she was able to get her keys. she said I was her hero.. and I thought about the book... see... guys break into cars.. thats what they do.. so It would have been more likly for a guy to help her... but then I thought about the other day when my car broke down and I had 3 women helping me and finally one guy came and stoped the traffic and then left w/ out doing anything else.. and I'm like.. hello guys know things about cars.. you wanna help us out. so I think women want to help but guys are just supposed to be our knights in shinning armor so God made so they would be braver and stronger... but girls do have hearts to help.. just arn't always the best canidate to help... then I thought about how they came up with that statment.. where did they get there data.. because seriously both those events prob. would not have been part of the statistics because they wern't big news story's. and most hero's go unnoticed anyway so who are my book authors talking about? does that make sense? I mean guys are more likely to help in certain situations... only because they have the required skills... it has nothing to do with women being inferior or whatever like the book made it seem. So I think Men a women are equally heroic... and my book authors are biased pigs.