Juneteenth

Jun 19, 2020 18:24

[CW: slavery, white supremacy, violence]

I had a long-form rambling blog post here about Juneteenth that I ultimately didn't like the tone or arrangement of. But I did like some of its content, so I'll try to reproduce that here in a significantly shorter, hopefully more-readable point-form post.



0. Preface


  • Today is an important commemoration day for the nominal end of slavery in America.

  • Reflecting on that as a white person, in today's new-found white interest in racism discourse, makes me think of a couple things I'm seeing in the writing of fellow whites that are a bit off, so I'm going to write about them here.

  • Two things are: institutions and history.

  • Not trying to derail from present emphasis on police brutality, will in fact buttress that; but also think the most-present aspects of that are well-covered elsewhere and the dimensions I want to discuss are important parts of what I see in Black discourse about racism that are being consciously or unconsciously neglected in white discourse about racism.



1. Institutions


  • Institutions exist. If you can take one point from this post, take that. Part of neoliberal political propaganda is to deny their existence in order to obscure the function of those that favour the ruling class and undermine those that favour the lower classes. If you ever see yourself saying "there are no institutions, only individuals" you are parroting this propaganda.

  • Example institutions: governments, policing, justice and legal systems; military systems; banks, corporations, markets and economic systems; schools and universities; hospitals, doctors, health authorities and psychiatric systems.

  • Institutions have individual actors within them but they are independent of their individuals; they have constitutive physical, legal, financial, and bureaucratic form that greatly outlives and exerts much greater collective power than any individual.

  • The term "systemic racism" is not a synonym for "ubiquitous individual racism" (which is a separate and real problem); it is a synonym for "institutional racism" and refers to racism that is embedded within the constitutive forms of the institution as much or more than it refers to any individuals associated with the institution. Focusing on indivuals is, again, repeating political propaganda that seeks to obscure the function of the institution.

  • Specifically: the policies and records held in an institution can be (and often are) racist without any ongoing human effort. They are documents (or database rows) with their own force, part of the institution itself. Changing an institution at that level requires changing the policies and records. When someone asks to see institutional change, and gives a list of policy-change demands, and is then met with a promise that there will be changes to individuals or staff, that is missing the demand. Policy changes are required.

  • Besides policy changes (which address current and future wrongs), changing records also matters in order to address past wrongs. Records record what happened in the past and if that was wrong, the records are wrong. When someone calls for purging criminal records of people wrongly prosecuted, or granting citizenship to people wrongly excluded from it, or transferring land or money back to people it was stolen from, they are talking about modifying institutional records to address past wrongs. This is sensible and again if it's met with only a promise to change individuals on staff, the point is being missed.



2. History

This entry was originally posted at https://graydon2.dreamwidth.org/280031.html. Please comment there using OpenID.
Previous post Next post
Up