[Action]

Jan 20, 2010 21:57

[Vash can be found today fairly deep in the woods. He went out that far in order to not be disturbed, but like that really matters in a place like Luceti. He’s rigged up a target on a rope that he’s run through several of the branches so that he can stand at the far end and yank on the rope and have the target swing down ( Read more... )

sanji, toph, presea, luffy, hisoka, jay, kouichi, target practice, death penalties suck, not happy

Leave a comment

aphephobic January 21 2010, 03:16:44 UTC
[Hisoka's been using the woods for similar reasons, especially since the latest New Feather cycle has left the village particularly noisy. He's within earshot when the target practice commences and, naturally assuming someone else is getting killed given the slant Luceti's taken lately, rushes toward the sound, a hand hovering over the concealed gun at his side. It's almost disappointing when he's close enough to tell that it's just a marksman nitpicking his work.]

He would've been dead enough. What's the difference?

Reply

goldenglasses January 21 2010, 03:25:53 UTC
[He jumps slightly, having not expected company.] No! That’s what’s wrong! Just that little bit… if I’m off even just that much it could do some real damage to someone! No one has the right to kill another!

Reply

aphephobic January 21 2010, 03:28:51 UTC
[His eyes shift from Vash's face to the gun and back again, raising an eyebrow quizzically.] That's a weird way to be a pacifist.

Reply

goldenglasses January 21 2010, 03:41:07 UTC
[Sighs and re-holsters his gun.] It was a gift and I decided it should be used to help those who are suffering.

Reply

aphephobic January 21 2010, 03:46:32 UTC
Was?

Reply

goldenglasses January 21 2010, 03:53:11 UTC
Huh? OH! Oh... no. Nothing like that he's still... around.

Reply

aphephobic January 21 2010, 03:57:04 UTC
No, you said it was a gift. So it's a gift you don't have anymore, is what you meant.

Reply

goldenglasses January 21 2010, 03:59:47 UTC
Uh. The gun was... is the gift I mean.

Reply

aphephobic January 21 2010, 04:02:22 UTC
In that case, you're being terribly ungrateful to whoever gave it to you, if you're not satisfied with that.

Reply

goldenglasses January 21 2010, 04:10:21 UTC
No! It's a good gun, a very good gun! [Of course the fact that he's protecting people with it isn't making the man who gave it to him very happy.]

Reply

aphephobic January 21 2010, 04:14:57 UTC
So what's the problem?

Reply

goldenglasses January 21 2010, 04:22:32 UTC
N-nothing I guess? Just that it is possible to not kill and use a gun.

Reply

aphephobic January 21 2010, 04:28:37 UTC
No it isn't.

Reply

goldenglasses January 21 2010, 13:00:36 UTC
I disagree! I've been doing it for a long time.

Reply

aphephobic January 21 2010, 17:42:08 UTC
Then it's only temporary. A gun is designed to be a weapon. You kill with it, or you're killed because of it. It's the natural order of things.

Reply

goldenglasses January 21 2010, 20:34:01 UTC
No. No one has the right to take another life. They can choose not to kill with a gun. Weapons can be used to protect; not destroy.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up