Open Letter to Rep Matt Dean, republican
to rep.matt.dean@house.mn
date Thu, May 5, 2011 at 12:24 AM
subject Name Calling
mailed-by gmail.com
Mr. Dean:
Slander and Libel are much more serious than name calling. Mr. Gaiman's fee was not $45,000, nor was it theft, Sir. It's the fee he legally charged which was voluntarily paid to him, consisting of $33, 600, which he subsequently donated to charities. The fact that you randomly crawled from beneath your rock and serpent-like engaged in name calling and lying is actionable, Sir. You should be aware your constituents and others are aware of your childish behavior. Congratulations on becoming even more twitter-infamous that Charlie Sheen. Perhaps you should wear that label with pride, as schoolyard bully, liar and libelous slanderer. As a politician you lose the right to behave as an individual and are required by your position to represent the people within your district. For you to begin a slander campaign against a popular and civic-minded gentleman such as Mr. Gaiman with no provocation is an indication of your unfitness to represent your district.
I recommend a full public retraction for the theft accusation, and not just the vague perfunctory apology for name-calling Mr. Gaiman.
Think about it.
A Burstall, MSA
Associate Professor
date Thu, May 5, 2011 at 12:24 AM
subject Name Calling
mailed-by gmail.com
Mr. Dean:
Slander and Libel are much more serious than name calling. Mr. Gaiman's fee was not $45,000, nor was it theft, Sir. It's the fee he legally charged which was voluntarily paid to him, consisting of $33, 600, which he subsequently donated to charities. The fact that you randomly crawled from beneath your rock and serpent-like engaged in name calling and lying is actionable, Sir. You should be aware your constituents and others are aware of your childish behavior. Congratulations on becoming even more twitter-infamous that Charlie Sheen. Perhaps you should wear that label with pride, as schoolyard bully, liar and libelous slanderer. As a politician you lose the right to behave as an individual and are required by your position to represent the people within your district. For you to begin a slander campaign against a popular and civic-minded gentleman such as Mr. Gaiman with no provocation is an indication of your unfitness to represent your district.
I recommend a full public retraction for the theft accusation, and not just the vague perfunctory apology for name-calling Mr. Gaiman.
Think about it.
A Burstall, MSA
Associate Professor