Quick & dirty fix for the display of deleted usernames

Aug 04, 2007 19:33

LJ has recently delinkified and unstruckthrough the user tags for deleted and suspended users. Like many of you, I am unhappy with that. Amongst other things.

I'd like to find a way to get the link back, but that's probably beyond me, if it's possible at all. But here's a little CSS that will at least make the usernames more noticeable.
span.ljuser ( Read more... )

lj, computers are our friends

Leave a comment

Comments 18

tunxeh August 5 2007, 00:37:17 UTC
There are a couple of sites for generating the html for LJ usernames here and here. Probably by using tags in the right places you can convert it to the proper strikethrough appearance: ... )

Reply

gnatkip August 5 2007, 00:53:02 UTC
Ah yes, that's excellent, thank you! I had some idea that that kind of thing existed, a while back, but I'd forgotten all about it.

But I'm most interested in having the names style themselves automagically, as they turn up in my browser, without having to be hand-coded. The old style like in your example would be ideal, but I couldn't swing that, so I just went for a color change. I'm hoping somebody else will be able to work it.

Reply


(The comment has been removed)

Re: here via friendsfriends gnatkip August 5 2007, 01:29:15 UTC
That's a good point, and one I didn't even think of, thanks! I've just tried it, and it works with basic accounts as well.

Reply


ileliberte August 5 2007, 01:14:58 UTC
span.ljuser { color: #CC0000 !important; text-decoration:line-through; font-weight:bold} would give a strikethrough and make it bold

Reply

gnatkip August 5 2007, 01:34:58 UTC
Thank you! I can't make the strikethrough work only for the deleted names, though. The color change works because the regular text is styled differently from links, and the deleted names aren't links anymore. But when I try the strikethrough, every username gets struck. Do you have an idea about how to fix it? *hopeful* :)

Reply

tunxeh August 5 2007, 03:24:34 UTC
I'm guessing adding something like

span.ljuser > a { text-decoration:none; }

after the previous line, to undecorate the ljusers that are actually linked somewhere.

But I'm no CSS expert...

Reply

gnatkip August 5 2007, 03:37:14 UTC
That ought to work! I tried it earlier today (I should have mentioned), and I just tried it again, and it does not work. I can't figure out if I'm doing something wrong, or if I'm misunderstanding the rules of CSS. And I'm no expert either.

Thank you for the idea, though!

Reply


ratcreature August 5 2007, 01:33:59 UTC
What annoys me most is that previously you could see with a mouseover whether a journal was suspended by LJ or just voluntarily deleted, without even the need to click the link, now both are just bold (and not even linked anymore so you can't click to easily check either of course).

Reply

gnatkip August 5 2007, 03:42:15 UTC
Very frustrating. Oh, lj. I love it so much, and I am disappointed.

Reply


la_fono August 6 2007, 00:14:55 UTC
Nice one! >:D

What I really don't get is LJ's choice of using bold. One uses bolding to call attention to something, no? *headscratch*

techycoder!RAWR

Reply

gnatkip August 6 2007, 01:14:07 UTC
Maybe they're slipping it all in gradually, and are planning on doing away with the bold on the next code update...

Did you get an email I hope?

Reply

la_fono August 6 2007, 02:13:38 UTC
Pfft, at present nothing would surprise me. I don't trust them as far as I can throw them...

I did. And I'm saying as;dlkjalsf♥ again ;) Goodnight! *kiss*

Reply

gnatkip August 6 2007, 01:35:24 UTC
Nevermind.

♥ ♥ ♥

Reply


Leave a comment

Up