Long overdue
(and not just the update; I've been busy this month!)
Looks as though my experiences with the work of Bjørn Lomborg aren't unique.
That said; I'm not going to make any judgements on the book until I've read it; and I'll try not to let my existing prejudices get in the way of my judgements; no-one is automatically valid just because they say something the reader would like to be true.
But it is good to see Lomborg getting subjected to what looks like a genuine critical analysis for a change, rather than the 'OMG! figures! lots of footnotes! he must be awfully clever!' treatment that a lot of the mass media have given him to date.
Looks as though my experiences with the work of Bjørn Lomborg aren't unique.
That said; I'm not going to make any judgements on the book until I've read it; and I'll try not to let my existing prejudices get in the way of my judgements; no-one is automatically valid just because they say something the reader would like to be true.
But it is good to see Lomborg getting subjected to what looks like a genuine critical analysis for a change, rather than the 'OMG! figures! lots of footnotes! he must be awfully clever!' treatment that a lot of the mass media have given him to date.