Information is classified for reasons. I understand that.
They want to be accepted as a governmental body? Then they divulge all unrestricted information. Leaders, command structure and hierarchy, organization, along with an official doctrine concerning their methodology and mission goals. Something they can be held to.
If and or when they diverge from that methodology or mission statement, they can then be held accountable. Right now you are relying on the Alliance to police the compound and itself.
I believe the saying goes... "But who shall guard the guardians?"
[screened between Quatre & Kragok, unhackable]desertprince04January 9 2009, 02:50:30 UTC
I'm not afraid of people knowing who I am and what I do, if it was your intent to flush out those associated with the Alliance. I'm also not afraid of the possibility that my associations put my life in danger. I'm willing to take that risk.
[screened to: quatre] [impossible to hack]gm_kragokJanuary 9 2009, 06:03:41 UTC
Ah-- you think my threat is valid.
Now, while I'm flattered that someone thinks I am so ruthless, allow me to settle the matter. I care about Rose. She is in the Alliance. For that simple fact, I will not actually kill anyone in that organization. However, I needed to be heard, and no one was listening to reason.
I therefore realized that if no one would listen to reason, they might at least notice seeming psychosis. It was a gambit, sir, a bluff, and it was called. You allowed me to air my true concerns, my true agenda, and then to point it out to someone who, while not perhaps the leader of the Alliance, apparently holds some clout.
Re: [screened to: quatre] [impossible to hack]desertprince04January 10 2009, 04:35:50 UTC
I see. I'm not sure just how much 'clout' I hold with the Alliance... but, you are welcome to come and voice your concerns and I will do my best to help them be heard if you wish.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
They want to be accepted as a governmental body? Then they divulge all unrestricted information. Leaders, command structure and hierarchy, organization, along with an official doctrine concerning their methodology and mission goals. Something they can be held to.
If and or when they diverge from that methodology or mission statement, they can then be held accountable. Right now you are relying on the Alliance to police the compound and itself.
I believe the saying goes... "But who shall guard the guardians?"
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
You accomplished my goal for me by commenting on this entry when I made the threat.
My hand was never forced, and I knew that few ever listen to reasonable dissent when there's already a... "catastrophe" in the works.
So I forced my own hand... to force yours.
Reply
Reply
Now, while I'm flattered that someone thinks I am so ruthless, allow me to settle the matter. I care about Rose. She is in the Alliance. For that simple fact, I will not actually kill anyone in that organization. However, I needed to be heard, and no one was listening to reason.
I therefore realized that if no one would listen to reason, they might at least notice seeming psychosis. It was a gambit, sir, a bluff, and it was called. You allowed me to air my true concerns, my true agenda, and then to point it out to someone who, while not perhaps the leader of the Alliance, apparently holds some clout.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment