Last weekend was the non-clinic with
Ross Jacobs - in the end it worked out as a mixture of a few private lessons and a sort of half-clinic, which worked out well. I certainly learned a lot from watching him work and the sessions we did with Cash, although I didn't get back in the saddle- Ross was of the opinion that if I want to be safe with the
(
Read more... )
I think "thought" is probably the right word- he wants the horse's mind going exactly where he is directing it, with them thinking about going where he is asking them to go and not anything else. Life and energy are terms I use because I'm used to them. Seems like this is an area where most people have their own terminology.
With the nose-below-knee thing, it's probably easier to generalise it as an evasion and allow people who have got to a point where their horse is in balance when their head is down there to get the hang of that for themselves, they're probably going to be a fair way along the road at any rate. The goal Ross was talking about was really to be able to bring the head up from there until the poll is the highest point, which is pretty much a classical thing as I understand it.
I think Ross focusses on avoiding patterns because he doesn't want the horse to be looking to the pattern instead of looking to their human. This is a bit of a balance point for me because I absolutely agree that I would rather my horse looked to me rather than needing a pattern to get them feeling safe, but that doesn't mean I wouldn't like to have something handy just in case. What Ross is really focussing is more about making sure the horse keeps looking for input from the human rather than giving them an opportunity to go off with their own thoughts and tune out. When you're working with your horse in any context you want that to be their focus as much as it is yours so if you do too many repetitions of any particular thing you've got a good chance of teaching the horse to do those things that way in that order, rather than teaching them to listen to your cues and follow them. It's a really fine balance.
Reply
At risk of tl;dr here. Basically, I want the horse to have the confidence that they can tell me "Hey! I'm really worried about this." I can choose to agree with their concern and provide my input on how to deal with it or I can blow it off because I've IDed the problem and the horse really needs to get over it. There's been a few circumstances where I've encountered mountain lions, bear, or something else of concern that the horse IDs before me. If I've established with the horse that it can tell me about a concern and be respected, then in those really big issues the horse is going to look to me after the initial startle, rather than startle and then react. Then again, this is a legitimate situation for me because bear and mountain lion have been spotted near the barn, and there's lots of coyotes around. I WANT to know if Mocha gets worried so I can anticipate issues. Now getting over racing bikes on the road...that's different from something she's smelled that could be a predator.
I do agree with both you and Ross about patterns. There are useful patterns--the everyday routine of grooming and tacking, for example. I've literally calmed Mocha down in an exciting barn situation by beginning one of those regular routines. But there's also patterns under saddle (see, for example, Mocha anticipating my six loop pattern, most recent post). One reason Western performance riders never practice an entire pattern is to avoid anticipation. The same issues also arise in trail class. Judges want to see the horse looking to the rider for direction. However, in practical everyday working riding, the rider might want anticipation and more independent thought.
I also find the best way to get a horse to refocus is to work the transitions. If a horse really pisses me off because it's being a butthead then I will start throwing fast transitions at them. However, there's also a place for fast transitions with a cooperative, higher level horse because those horses start seeing the work as a fun game. But doing this work requires a deft hand and a lot of tact because it's a fine balance. A horse like Mocha gets to be a lot of fun at this level because a lot of my training focus becomes showing her the rhythm of a particular movement. Once she gets that rhythm, she enjoys playing that game. I'm counting on that keen interest to develop tempi changes in her before midwinter. We've fumbled through them but she's got a big mental block (due to past training that did need to happen, but now we have to convince her that the Exceptions Are Okay). However, even the first fumbling attempts are Way Kewl. I can just imagine what happens when both of us get to the point where we have the strength and timing to hold it and do it correctly.
Reply
I don't think that you would ever get to a place where you shut down a horse's self preservation or where you would want to. But as you say, the human needs the casting vote.
Reply
Leave a comment