LIBER OZ Uber Alles!!!mrdaFebruary 23 2006, 15:28:28 UTC
"every organ of society"
So that's how the UN see us - I'll keep that in mind...
"Everyone has the right to a nationality."
What the fuck does this even mean?
(1) Everyone has the right to work, to free choice of employment, to just and favourable conditions of work and to protection against unemployment.
Why exactly? Doesn't that depend on people willing to employ them? Does this mean employers will be forced to hire against their own judgement?
"Everyone who works has the right to just and favourable remuneration ensuring for himself and his family an existence worthy of human dignity, and supplemented, if necessary, by other means of social protection."
How do they measure "human dignity" then?
"Everyone has duties to the community in which alone the free and full development of his personality is possible."
Am I "free" if bound by a "duty to the community"? Pah!
"In the exercise of his rights and freedoms, everyone shall be subject only to such limitations as are determined by law solely for the purpose of securing due recognition and respect for the rights and freedoms of others and of meeting the just requirements of morality, public order and the general welfare in a democratic society."
Never mind the fact that every society, democratic or not, has it's own (often arbitrary and/or theological) standards of "morality, public order and the general welfare"....
As for the Shari'ah shitheads....
"prohibited to take away life except for a Shari’ah-prescribed reason."
"It is forbidden to resort to such means as may result in the genocidal annihilation of mankind."
Even if most or all of mankind breaks the Shari'ah law? Hmm....
"Islam is the religion of unspoiled nature. It is prohibited to exercise any form of compulsion on man or to exploit his poverty or ignorance in order to convert him to another religion or to atheism."
HAHAHAHA! Double standards much?
Everyone shall have the right to live in a clean environment, away from vice and moral corruption
That means leaving Cairo then, I guess....
"Everyone shall have the right to express his opinion freely in such manner as would not be contrary to the principles of the Shari’ah."
"It may not be exploited or misused in such a way as may violate sanctities and the dignity of Prophets, undermine moral and ethical values or disintegrate, corrupt or harm society or weaken its faith."
Translation: Hit up them darn Jews and infidels all you want, but make one pencil stroke pertaining to our kiddie-fiddler of a prophet and prepare to part with your head.
I'll take Liber OZ over Theocratic and Democratic slave moralities any day!
Re: LIBER OZ Uber Alles!!!ghostdog_February 23 2006, 17:51:42 UTC
Interesting...
The Democratic slave morals slip under the radar time and time again, with me and most others. Then again, the UN never shouts about 'human rights abuses' relating to any of those minor ones. Perhaps some re-wording is in order, or maybe we just need to question what things like "protection against unemployment" actually means and entails.
Liber OZ is perfect in my opinion, if there is a better system of bare-bones ethics, I have yet to see it.
So that's how the UN see us - I'll keep that in mind...
"Everyone has the right to a nationality."
What the fuck does this even mean?
(1) Everyone has the right to work, to free choice of employment, to just and favourable conditions of work and to protection against unemployment.
Why exactly? Doesn't that depend on people willing to employ them? Does this mean employers will be forced to hire against their own judgement?
"Everyone who works has the right to just and favourable remuneration ensuring for himself and his family an existence worthy of human dignity, and supplemented, if necessary, by other means of social protection."
How do they measure "human dignity" then?
"Everyone has duties to the community in which alone the free and full development of his personality is possible."
Am I "free" if bound by a "duty to the community"? Pah!
"In the exercise of his rights and freedoms, everyone shall be subject only to such limitations as are determined by law solely for the purpose of securing due recognition and respect for the rights and freedoms of others and of meeting the just requirements of morality, public order and the general welfare in a democratic society."
Never mind the fact that every society, democratic or not, has it's own (often arbitrary and/or theological) standards of "morality, public order and the general welfare"....
As for the Shari'ah shitheads....
"prohibited to take away life except for a Shari’ah-prescribed reason."
"It is forbidden to resort to such means as may result in the genocidal annihilation of mankind."
Even if most or all of mankind breaks the Shari'ah law? Hmm....
"Islam is the religion of unspoiled nature. It is prohibited to exercise any form of compulsion on man or to exploit his poverty or ignorance in order to convert him to another religion or to atheism."
HAHAHAHA! Double standards much?
Everyone shall have the right to live in a clean environment, away from vice and moral corruption
That means leaving Cairo then, I guess....
"Everyone shall have the right to express his opinion freely in such manner as would not be contrary to the principles of the Shari’ah."
"It may not be exploited or misused in such a way as may violate sanctities and the dignity of Prophets, undermine moral and ethical values or disintegrate, corrupt or harm society or weaken its faith."
Translation: Hit up them darn Jews and infidels all you want, but make one pencil stroke pertaining to our kiddie-fiddler of a prophet and prepare to part with your head.
I'll take Liber OZ over Theocratic and Democratic slave moralities any day!
Reply
The Democratic slave morals slip under the radar time and time again, with me and most others. Then again, the UN never shouts about 'human rights abuses' relating to any of those minor ones. Perhaps some re-wording is in order, or maybe we just need to question what things like "protection against unemployment" actually means and entails.
Liber OZ is perfect in my opinion, if there is a better system of bare-bones ethics, I have yet to see it.
Reply
Leave a comment