Too Old For The Job

[ggreig]

That sounds worrying, doesn't it? Luckily it's the job title that may be too old, not me.

Because of the impending change to the law that will outlaw ageism, it's been suggested that my job title of Senior Software Developer might no longer be appropriate, as Senior could be taken to suggest that you have to be an old dude to hold such a post. At

Comments

[sharikkamur]

Don't you just love political correctness?

How about Principal Software Developer? I know it sounds a bit civil service, but it might work. Or possibly Executive Software Developer

[ggreig]

Principal kind of suggests "there can be only one". I like the sound of Executive, but I'm not sure I could carry it off. :-)

[ffutures]

Hmmm... I'm a senior laboratory technician, but the other technician is older than I am. Wonder if we'll run into this particular bit of PC idiocy.

[ggreig]

It's hard to say. Apparently it wasn't something we were concerned about until it was mentioned somewhere external and there were some sharp intakes of breath. I guess it depends how widespread a reaction that is.

[tobyaw]

Senior has two distinct meanings - being of more advanced age, or being in a higher or more authoritative position. It all sounds rather silly to me, ignoring one meaning in favour of the other.

I agree with your thoughts on using engineer in a job title, especially as one can work towards being a real engineer with the BCS. Likewise, architect is an inappropriate title.

What about:

Class 1 Developer
Superior Developer
Programmer of High Rank

Or like American generals, you could be a one-, two- or three-star developer?

[ggreig]

Both "Class 1" and the star system suffer from the fact that unless a numerical system is broadly recognised it can be read in two ways - "What, you're still only a Class 1 developer?" - and the bounds of the scale may not be obvious, or strictly observed.

I rather like your other two suggestions, but as with sharikkamur's suggestion of Executive Software Developer I would anticipate some resistance! "Superior Developer" seems to be the most popular suggestion - a couple of people have given me that one verbally.

I should investigate BCS recognition as an engineer, but there's a certain amount of personal inertia to overcome first.

[sharikkamur]

How about Executive Software Engineer?

I too need to get rid of some of that personal inertia - I really ought to join the BCS. I really, really, really ought to join the BCS. I really, really... :)

[sharikkamur]

Or a three-layered system:

Programmer
Programmer Sapiens
Programmer Sapiens Sapiens

You could naturally extend this downwards for new graduates to Programmer Neanderthalensis...

[silverwhistle]

This is ridiculous!
What about "Senior Lecturers"? Are they to be renamed?

And... 39? You're still a boy!

[cavolo]

Gavin,

At my work the HR department has been pondering this issue for some time. All the senior economists and so on are now 'lead' economists or whatever.

Which isn't really right as there are other levels above that. Speaking as a Principal Economist I'm not sure I'd appreciate people who were only 'senior' now being 'principal' as Toby suggested...

It's thrown a large metaphorical rock into that pool of job titles that some organisations have to use to create many impressive sounding but subtly different grades. I'm sure that the HR departments and philologists of the world will crack the problem in time. Maybe 'junior vice president' is still available?

[ggreig]

Thanks Gareth. I think so far my favourite fun suggestion has been "Majestic Software Developer", but unfortunately there haven't been any great suggestions that are also usable. "Lead" is one of the more likely alternatives being mentioned here, but it has exactly the problem that you point out - i.e. there are other posts above it.

I guess it's over to the HR departments and philologists then...