He is just as militant about his beliefs as the strongest religious zealot, and as convinced that anyone who believes otherwise is wrong. However, he seems gleefully oblivious of this hypocrisy.
I just don't dig on anyone who's all, "My opinion is the only right point of view", really.
I'm not aware of Dawkins advocating war, suicide bombing or murder in the name of atheism. Yes, he is convinced that belief in invisible sky-people is wrong and that science is correct, based on evidence. It's not so much about opinions as it is verifiable proof vs faith.
If anyone can offer genuine proof as to the existence of God, Allah, Krishna, Zeus, Odin or leprechauns I'll be the first to convert.
That said, I do agree that he gets rather strident and that's not necessarily the best way to bring people around to oner's way of thinking.
You can't prove that something doesn't exist. It doesn't automatically follow that one should assume it does.
Point taken though, he's not particularly polite when dealing with matters of faith. That's one of the things I happen to like about him, he pulls no punches, but I can absolutely understand why others wouldn't like it much.
Depends whether it's being pushed on you with no regard for what your own feelings are on the matter. I know many people who are religious without being disrespectful of the beliefs of others - just as I know many atheists and agnostics who are the same way.
Well, Christianity isn't the only religion in the world, and you might find it edifying to read the Gospels sometime.
Oh, and Pope John Paul II of the Catholic church, which is the largest Christian denomination, declared quite some time ago that hell isn't fire and brimstone, but the state of exclusion from God. Splitting hairs, really, but nevertheless, I don't agree with your position.
He is just as militant about his beliefs as the strongest religious zealot, and as convinced that anyone who believes otherwise is wrong. However, he seems gleefully oblivious of this hypocrisy.
I just don't dig on anyone who's all, "My opinion is the only right point of view", really.
Reply
Yes, he is convinced that belief in invisible sky-people is wrong and that science is correct, based on evidence. It's not so much about opinions as it is verifiable proof vs faith.
If anyone can offer genuine proof as to the existence of God, Allah, Krishna, Zeus, Odin or leprechauns I'll be the first to convert.
That said, I do agree that he gets rather strident and that's not necessarily the best way to bring people around to oner's way of thinking.
Reply
I think he's disrespectful. I don't like it.
Reply
It doesn't automatically follow that one should assume it does.
Point taken though, he's not particularly polite when dealing with matters of faith. That's one of the things I happen to like about him, he pulls no punches, but I can absolutely understand why others wouldn't like it much.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
RUDE.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Oh, and Pope John Paul II of the Catholic church, which is the largest Christian denomination, declared quite some time ago that hell isn't fire and brimstone, but the state of exclusion from God. Splitting hairs, really, but nevertheless, I don't agree with your position.
I should come back when it's not 5 am :P
For the record, I'm agnostic.
Reply
Do you want me to explain how I think Islam is rude too or are we done?
Reply
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Leave a comment