I looked over the Shakespeare meme that's going around, but the problem with that is that it presumes that you've seen the plays both on stage and in the movies. I have never seen a Shakespeare play on stage or in the movies. The only adaptation of a Shakespeare play that I know I've seen is West Side Story. I've only ever read two plays for
(
Read more... )
Comments 59
I have never really understood the wrock phenomenon. It's... highly specialised filk, I suppose, except it's more the rock version. About Harry Potter. Which I've never felt was particularly filkable.
Naturally, I have friends who adore it.
But! I digress!
You belong in the fandom as much as any other fan -- it's just that you're more a book person than a media person, which is also how I am considering how early I started (the movies were not even a dirty thought in JKR's mind at that point). You relate to the work differently. I personally wouldn't invalidate you as a fan for the way you do things. I hope to hell nobody else tries. *gets all glowery*
As for Shakespeare? I read him for the slash. Take that, purists.
Reply
I think the only slash I've ever spotted in Shakespeare has been Romeo/Mercutio. And really, that's hard to miss, so I can't get much credit for that.
What other Shakespearean slash have you spotted?
Reply
Reply
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
Reply
I don't hate Shakespeare. If I did, I wouldn't have written about Lady Macbeth for femgenficathon.
But I will admit to an abiding hatred for Romeo and Juliet. I have two issues with that play:
1) The kids don't know each other. They meet at a party, talk for long enough to recite a sonnet, talk to each other after the party (her on the balcony, him in the garden, and probably every neighbor in Verona yelling, "Would you shut UP, we're trying to sleep!"), and the next day Romeo is tearing off to Friar Lawrence's telling him that he wants to marry this girl he met the night before. And they get married the same day. And they have sex that night. That's it. The sum total of the time they know each other breaks down to less than twenty-four hours.
Now, I don't believe you can love anyone in so little time. Be infatuated as hell, yes. Be in love, no.
2) Everyone and their brother claims this story is about true love. And I see no evidence of this. Romeo blathers about Rosaline ( ... )
Reply
Reply
Reply
1. hamlet with David Tennant and Patrick Stewart
2. Kenneth's Branagh's Hamlet (which I believe is the only full-version screen version)
3. Zefferelli's Romeo and Juliet--the first version I saw on screen and is quite beautiful.
4. Oddly - considering how much I hate di Caprio, his version of R&J because it just WORKS.
5. Jeremy Iron's VERY VERY slashy version of Merchant of Venice - utterly spellbinding. It plays down Portia thanks God.
There's a great list here - any of the RSC versions are great.
http://www.screenonline.org.uk/tv/id/566363/index.html
6.
Reply
Reply
Reply
The Jeremy Irons Merchant of Venice has a "no circulation" tag on it.
*blinks* Leonardo DiCaprio was actually GOOD in something?
The David Tennant-Patrick Stewart version of Hamlet simply does not exist in any library in my town, and possibly not in all of Connecticut.
Reply
Reply
What I'd really like to see is Richard III done in the Jasper Fforde way, with audience participation.
Okay, I've read the Thursday Next series and the Nursery Crimes series...but I don't know what you mean by seeing Richard III done the Jasper Fforde way, unless you're going to introduce an agent from Jurisfiction into the plot.
Reply
Sort of like a Shakespearean version of Rocky Horror Show...
Reply
And my old housemate and I used to amuse ourselves by randomly shouting 'When is the winter of our discontent?' at one another, thereby prompting the other one to launch into the speech while the former did all the callbacks.
Reply
Leave a comment