X-Factor started at 8pm, Atlantis started at 8.15pm, right after Strictly Come Dancing.
DigitalSpy:
'Strictly Come Dancing' leads Saturday ratings with 9m Strictly Come Dancing ratings hit a series high last night (November 2). The BBC One dance competition continued its successful 11th series with 10m viewers and a 44% audience share, peaking at
(
Read more... )
Reply
Reply
Do you by any chance remember about Robin Hood's ratings? Do you think they can be compared to these?
Reply
IMO the J's never fully understood what made Merlin so succesfull and LOVED. Fandom and the general audience put up with the show's weaknesses for so long because they made us love the characters during the first (two) series. Basically no one loved the show because of fart jokes, troll sex, CGI shenanigans (something the J's still think makes an awesome show) or the show turning ~darker~ every year. We loved the show because we loved the characters. Even those they managed to butcher with OTT behaviour in later series. And let's not even speak of the Merlin cast. They were all amazing (they still are, obviously). OR BRADLEY'S AND COLIN'S HOT-LIKE-BURNING-LET'S-JUST-EYE-FUCK-24/7 CHEMISTRY ON AND OFF SCREEN ( ... )
Reply
Reply
Reply
I wouldn't be surprised if the whole Jason's from the 21st century thing was something they've gone back and added in a la Gwen and her enchanted bracelet in 4.09. 'Cause that worked really well for them! Pythagorus actually doing some maths would mean somebody would have to think it up first! Way to hard
Reply
Reply
I certainly agree, it certainly doesn't represent the entire viewing audience, (and nor did I watch it solely for Merlin and Arthur either). However I think that the showrunners think it does.
The point I was making was, as far as I understood, Capps and Murphy went back and added in the scenes with the bracelet after filming, and then it was never brought up again. It was an important plot point that was dropped and promptly forgotten for the rest of the series. When questioned about it at the SDCC both Capps and Murphy said it wasn't important.
Seems to me something similar may have occurred here with Jason being from the 21st century thing *shrugs* its just a guess.
Reply
Reply
Very true. And because this show is called MERLIN, and no matter how part of the audience deny it, the show revolves around the relationship between Arthur and Merlin, that's no where for Gwen's character to go. To make Arthur a good king & man is Merlin's destiny, that leaves almost no room for anyone else to have very meaningful stories around Arthur. Given that, to remove Lancelot is a bad choice. I always think the set-up of Gwen and her union with Arthur from different classes/background is a duplicate of Merlin and Arthur's relationship. The producers also didn't have the ability to integrate all the characters in a more structured way. In this circumstancs, no matter who take the Gwen role, it is kindly failed by the writing and direction of her story at the first beginning.
Reply
Reply
About chemistry thing, Bradley and Colin's chemistry it the ONE that every producer would dream of. But I don't think the producers have the ability to fully utilize this greatest asset in this show.
Reply
Reply
People say that the show was called Merlin and about Merlin and Arthur and while they were important, the other characters and ships were important too and I felt that they really had trouble balancing all the characters which makes me sad. There was a lot of potential.
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment