I think gdb is letting his personal feelings allow him to join the bandwagon against this person. It almost makes me wonder what he does with his time... So you jump in, and start making comments about him? Way to jump on the bandwagon yourself. Being as you're just an uninvolved friend.
although IQs dont take into account mental stability, I must say that she is quite sane. I mean they wouldnt let her do a degree in psych without her sanity! Untrue. For instance, I would assume that someone with DID would be assumed to be somewhat lacking in sanity, at least according to the DSM IV. This book, written by Tracy Alderman, PhD, who suffers from the disorder she's writing about, and tackles it from that angle.
Now the comments posted in doooks LJ prob put a lot of people against her HOWEVER these were all friends of dooooks so they will stick together wont they?Well, as I don't even know who this doook person is, nor have I read the discussion in question. I'd think this leaves me out of the "people against her" over that discussion
( ... )
Oh and one can threaten to use legal action if one harasses a person in any way. Especially if they involve others in the slander. Thought Id bring that up. You might want to look at the fact that both "you" and franeh have said a variety of things, probably in recorded logs, if nothing else. Thus, you're putting yourselves in the same position. And actually, slander isn't slander if it's just between two people. More people need to get involved, and reputation needs to be tarnished. I personally haven't been affected by anything that's been said, and have given the people involved all the benefit of the doubt. However, franeh's actions seem to have spoken for themselves in her overreactions to many various things, her overarching superiority complex, among other things. And just so you know, this isn't slander. It's my assessment of the truth. Constructively, I really think she needs to work on those things in particular.
I cant defend you in this situation as you had no right, for lack of a better word, to make this post and chose to call
( ... )
I ought to let this all restcagewenchJuly 3 2004, 15:12:33 UTC
however, sometimes I'm just a bitch.
I think her last attempt at superiority is in her LJ. Since I know her fondness for re-writing and deleting, and since she disallowed commments on the aforementioned post, I cut and pasted it to a public post in my LJ, to reply to each section.
Re: I ought to let this all restenotsolaJuly 3 2004, 20:22:14 UTC
heh, I just replied to it in e-mail. Figured it was easier to deal with it that way, out of the public eye. Less drama that way, possibly. No reply though. I'm so surprised. Although I was really tempted to copy it to my LJ and do the same.
Re: I ought to let this all restcagewenchJuly 3 2004, 20:58:08 UTC
I'd be curious to see your reply... email it to cagewench@livejournal.com if you don't mind, I'd like to see what someone else's take on that diatribe of hers was. :>
Reply
Reply
So you jump in, and start making comments about him? Way to jump on the bandwagon yourself. Being as you're just an uninvolved friend.
although IQs dont take into account mental stability, I must say that she is quite sane. I mean they wouldnt let her do a degree in psych without her sanity!
Untrue. For instance, I would assume that someone with DID would be assumed to be somewhat lacking in sanity, at least according to the DSM IV. This book, written by Tracy Alderman, PhD, who suffers from the disorder she's writing about, and tackles it from that angle.
Now the comments posted in doooks LJ prob put a lot of people against her HOWEVER these were all friends of dooooks so they will stick together wont they?Well, as I don't even know who this doook person is, nor have I read the discussion in question. I'd think this leaves me out of the "people against her" over that discussion ( ... )
Reply
Thought Id bring that up.
You might want to look at the fact that both "you" and franeh have said a variety of things, probably in recorded logs, if nothing else. Thus, you're putting yourselves in the same position.
And actually, slander isn't slander if it's just between two people. More people need to get involved, and reputation needs to be tarnished. I personally haven't been affected by anything that's been said, and have given the people involved all the benefit of the doubt. However, franeh's actions seem to have spoken for themselves in her overreactions to many various things, her overarching superiority complex, among other things. And just so you know, this isn't slander. It's my assessment of the truth. Constructively, I really think she needs to work on those things in particular.
I cant defend you in this situation as you had no right, for lack of a better word, to make this post and chose to call ( ... )
Reply
I think her last attempt at superiority is in her LJ. Since I know her fondness for re-writing and deleting, and since she disallowed commments on the aforementioned post, I cut and pasted it to a public post in my LJ, to reply to each section.
Now, I think I'm done.
I say think because I try to never say never :>
Reply
*shakes head*
I totally called the deletion factor on that one.
I wonder if she thinks the act of deleting her posts and/or replies means it never happened. Then she'd be worse off than I thought...
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment